Re: RFR: 8318328: DHKEM should check XDH name in case-insensitive mode

2023-10-17 Thread Hai-May Chao
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:03:33 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > The comparison should have been done in case-insensitive mode. > > The new test confirms the change inside `DHKEM.java`. The one in > `XDHPrivateKeyImpl.java` is not easy to confirm. The SUN provider's > implementation always got the name

Re: RFR: 8318328: DHKEM should check XDH name in case-insensitive mode

2023-10-17 Thread Mark Powers
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:03:33 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > The comparison should have been done in case-insensitive mode. > > The new test confirms the change inside `DHKEM.java`. The one in > `XDHPrivateKeyImpl.java` is not easy to confirm. The SUN provider's > implementation always got the name

Re: RFR: 8318328: DHKEM should check XDH name in case-insensitive mode

2023-10-17 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:03:33 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > The comparison should have been done in case-insensitive mode. > > The new test confirms the change inside `DHKEM.java`. The one in > `XDHPrivateKeyImpl.java` is not easy to confirm. The SUN provider's > implementation always got the name

RFR: 8318328: DHKEM should check XDH name in case-insensitive mode

2023-10-17 Thread Weijun Wang
The comparison should have been done in case-insensitive mode. The new test confirms the change inside `DHKEM.java`. The one in `XDHPrivateKeyImpl.java` is not easy to confirm. The SUN provider's implementation always got the name "correct". - Commit messages: - the fix Changes: