On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:34:37 GMT, Mat Carter wrote:
>> @wangweij, please see the release note above.
>
>> @rebarbora-mckvak I've added the release note as
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340661 last month.
>>
>> I didn't approve because of Mat's Aug 14 comment:
>>
>> > I think there's
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:34:37 GMT, Mat Carter wrote:
>> @wangweij, please see the release note above.
>
>> @rebarbora-mckvak I've added the release note as
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340661 last month.
>>
>> I didn't approve because of Mat's Aug 14 comment:
>>
>> > I think there's
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:29:28 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> @rebarbora-mckvak Please put the release note here and I can create it.
>> Thanks.
>
> @wangweij, please see the release note above.
> @rebarbora-mckvak I've added the release note as
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340661 las
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:29:28 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> @rebarbora-mckvak Please put the release note here and I can create it.
>> Thanks.
>
> @wangweij, please see the release note above.
@rebarbora-mckvak I've added the release note as
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8340661 last mo
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:53:52 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> I tried to follow the instructions to write a release note, but since this
>> is my first contribution, I do not have an account on JBS.
>
> @rebarbora-mckvak Please put the release note here and I can create it.
> Thanks.
@wangweij, plea
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:50:37 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8313367: copyright updated
>
> I tried to follow the instructions to write a release note, but since this is
>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:01:36 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> [One of the
> test](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/sun/security/mscapi/VeryLongAlias.java)
good link, thanks. Didn’t know the type is even visible for an assert.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:57:12 GMT, Bernd wrote:
>> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8313367: copyright updated
>
> Did you test with CNG keys as well? Using the new providers is much more
> important since
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that permissions to use a certificate in a local machine store
> must be granted - in a m
13 matches
Mail list logo
