On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:48:21 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues goi
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:48:21 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues goi
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:48:21 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues goi
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:29:40 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/security/SignedJar/spi-calendar-provider/provider/baz/CalendarDataProviderImpl.java
>> line 2:
>>
>>> 1: /*
>>> 2: * Copyright (c) 2012, 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
>>> reserved.
>>
>> Did you copy th
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:09:25 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adjust test setup
>
> test/jdk/java/security/SignedJar/spi-calendar-provider/provider/baz/CalendarDataProviderImpl.jav
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 11:13:29 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues goi
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:50:30 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues goi
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:07:20 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Since this is a different way of testing the same underlying issue and the
> problem shows up in more than one way, I agree it is a good idea to add
> another regression test. However, I would put in the same test directory as
> 8280890: te
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:56:49 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues goi
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a regression
when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced and
subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar issues
going forward. Thoughts?
Testing: Manually produced a build without
[JD
15 matches
Mail list logo
