On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:52:33 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> When `X509CRLSelector ` requires a CRL number extension but a CRL does not
>> have it, the CRL should not be selected.
>>
>> Note: the test uses a new internal API introduced in
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11151.
>
> Weijun Wan
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 03:37:02 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> I guess the compatibility impact is low?
Without the fix, an NPE will be thrown.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11215
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:52:33 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> When `X509CRLSelector ` requires a CRL number extension but a CRL does not
>> have it, the CRL should not be selected.
>>
>> Note: the test uses a new internal API introduced in
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11151.
>
> Weijun Wan
> When `X509CRLSelector ` requires a CRL number extension but a CRL does not
> have it, the CRL should not be selected.
>
> Note: the test uses a new internal API introduced in
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11151.
Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additiona
