On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that pe
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:50:46 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8313367: getti
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
copyright fixed
-
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:53:52 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> I tried to follow the instructions to write a release note, but since this
>> is my first contribution, I do not have an account on JBS.
>
> @rebarbora-mckvak Please put the release note here and I can create it.
&g
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8313367: test update
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:38:04 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8313367: signHash looks for a key in either user or machine store
>
> src/jd
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8313367: copyrigh
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:47:43 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> But because of user privilege missing, the private key is not available and
> it shows as a certificate entry.
You can have applications that need a certificate (public key) only e.g. to
verify signatures. This way you can use the same entr
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:25:47 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8313367: signHash
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:45:32 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:
>>
>> - 8313367: signHash finds a key in the local machine store
>&
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:23:39 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commi
ust be granted - in a management console, select a certificate, right-click
> -> All tasks... -> Manage Private Keys... -> add Full control to user.
rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unr
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that pe
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that pe
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:52:01 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that pe
This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
read-only (instead of failing).
Please note that permissions to use a certificate in a local machine store must
be granted - in a management cons
22 matches
Mail list logo
