Re: RFR: 8341927: Replace hardcoded security providers with new test.provider.name system property [v7]

2024-11-20 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:12:30 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote: >> In this PR, I removed hard-coded security providers and replaced them with a >> system property, test.provider.name. If the property is not specified, the >> provider originally used in the test is used: >> >> Cipher c = Cipher.getIns

Re: RFR: 8343848: Fix typo of propery name in TestOAEPPadding after 8341927

2024-11-08 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:25:33 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier wrote: > Trivial fix of typo. > > Thanks to @RealLucy for spotting this! Looks good. And trivial. - Marked as reviewed by lucy (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21990#pullrequestreview-2424291232

Re: [jdk22] RFR: 8319128: sun/security/pkcs11 tests fail on OL 7.9 aarch64

2024-01-24 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:21:42 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier wrote: > I backport this to fix this issue in 22. We see it failing there in our CI. Looks good. - Marked as reviewed by lucy (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22/pull/95#pullrequestreview-1841351221

Re: RFR: JDK-8316671: sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketCloseHang.java test fails intermittent with Read timed out

2023-09-26 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:23:20 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: > We sometimes run into the following error. This especially occurs when > running with fastdebug binaries and on Linux ppc64le machines. > Current timeout set in the test is 1 second. > > Server accepting: 315357614990101 > Server accep

Re: RFR: JDK-8316341: sun/security/pkcs11/PKCS11Test.java needs adjustment on Linux ppc64le Ubuntu 22

2023-09-15 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:21:00 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: > Currently sun/security/pkcs11/PKCS11Test.java needs adjustment on Linux > ppc64le Ubuntu 22, it does not find the NSS libs because the new file system > locations are not handled, unlike on Linux x86_64 . LGTM. Thanks for tracking dow

Re: RFR: JDK-8315644: increase timeout of sun/security/tools/jarsigner/Warning.java

2023-09-04 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:09:08 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: > on some slow machines, sun/security/tools/jarsigner/Warning.java runs > sometimes into timeouts (with fastdebug binaries). > So the current timeout of the test should be increased. LGTM. - Marked as reviewed by lucy (Revie

Integrated: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls

2023-02-28 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:29:34 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote: > This PR addresses an issue in the AES-CTR mode intrinsic on s390. When a > message is ciphered in multiple, small (< 16 bytes) segments, the result is > incorrect. > > This is not just a band-aid fix. The issue was ta

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v5]

2023-02-27 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:03:49 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote: >> This PR addresses an issue in the AES-CTR mode intrinsic on s390. When a >> message is ciphered in multiple, small (< 16 bytes) segments, the result is >> incorrect. >> >> This is not just a band-aid fix

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v5]

2023-02-27 Thread Lutz Schmidt
mplete. > > **Reviews and comments are very much appreciated.** > > @backwaterred could you please run some "official" s390 tests? Thanks. Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 8299

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v4]

2023-02-27 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 07:51:24 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: >> Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains four commits: >> >> - Merge master to resolve copyright conflict >> - 829817:

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v4]

2023-02-20 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 12:21:27 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote: >> This PR addresses an issue in the AES-CTR mode intrinsic on s390. When a >> message is ciphered in multiple, small (< 16 bytes) segments, the result is >> incorrect. >> >> This is not just a band-aid fix

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v4]

2023-02-20 Thread Lutz Schmidt
mplete. > > **Reviews and comments are very much appreciated.** > > @backwaterred could you please run some "official" s390 tests? Thanks. Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains four commits

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v2]

2023-02-16 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:26:57 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote: >> This PR addresses an issue in the AES-CTR mode intrinsic on s390. When a >> message is ciphered in multiple, small (< 16 bytes) segments, the result is >> incorrect. >> >> This is not just a band-aid fix

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v3]

2023-02-16 Thread Lutz Schmidt
mplete. > > **Reviews and comments are very much appreciated.** > > @backwaterred could you please run some "official" s390 tests? Thanks. Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 829817: fixed typos, rem

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v2]

2023-01-30 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:23:54 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: >> Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> 8299817: Update copyright > > test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/codegen/aes/Test8299817.java

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls [v2]

2023-01-30 Thread Lutz Schmidt
mplete. > > **Reviews and comments are very much appreciated.** > > @backwaterred could you please run some "official" s390 tests? Thanks. Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 8299817: Update copyright

Re: RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls

2023-01-16 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:29:34 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote: > This PR addresses an issue in the AES-CTR mode intrinsic on s390. When a > message is ciphered in multiple, small (< 16 bytes) segments, the result is > incorrect. > > This is not just a band-aid fix. The issue was ta

RFR: 8299817: [s390] AES-CTR mode intrinsic fails with multiple short update() calls

2023-01-12 Thread Lutz Schmidt
This PR addresses an issue in the AES-CTR mode intrinsic on s390. When a message is ciphered in multiple, small (< 16 bytes) segments, the result is incorrect. This is not just a band-aid fix. The issue was taken as a chance to restructure the code. though still complicated, It is now easier to