Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v14]

2024-11-12 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:35:54 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: >> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to >> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication >> parts of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the >> jdk.tls.disab

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v13]

2024-11-12 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:11:48 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: >> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to >> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication >> parts of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the >> jdk.tls.disab

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v9]

2024-11-09 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 00:07:07 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: >> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to >> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication >> parts of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the >> jdk.tls.disabl

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v9]

2024-11-09 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 00:07:07 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: >> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to >> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication >> parts of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the >> jdk.tls.disabl

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v9]

2024-11-09 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 00:07:07 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: >> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to >> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication >> parts of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the >> jdk.tls.disabl

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v6]

2024-11-08 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:36:34 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: >> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to >> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication >> parts of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the >> jdk.tls.disabl

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v5]

2024-11-08 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:54:45 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: > * I think we shouldn't care if someone wants to use other regex syntax > matching, maybe someone will find it useful. We just not going to document > this to avoid any confusion, most people will just use `*`. `*` isn't valid regex (whic

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v5]

2024-11-08 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
Am 08.11.2024 um 03:15 schrieb David Schlosnagle: On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 22:13:04 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote: I've tried to comment on Github but the bot that required me to accept the TOS doesn't seem to automatically restore it while stating the opposite in the comment. I don't want to fight t

Re: RFR: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite [v5]

2024-11-08 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:25:12 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote: >> Artur Barashev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 25 additional >> com

Re: New candidate JEP: 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager

2024-09-26 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
Am 26.09.2024 um 13:50 schrieb Mark Reinhold: it has rarely been used to secure server-side code, and it is costly to maintain. We're one of these "rare" users and are using SecurityManager to prevent unallowed parts of a server-application to start sub processes (sm.canExec) and to sh

Re: Private Keys are cached "forever" leading to inop HTTP-TLS-servers

2022-06-21 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
Am 21.06.2022 um 09:32 schrieb Andrew Haley: On 6/16/22 21:02, Lothar Kimmeringer wrote: If they are allowed to become unuseable (as explained, I see that as something that is to be expected IRL) I don't think they are. There is nothing in PKCS#11 that gives an implementatio

Wrong mailadresses in List-mail-headers in mails from security-dev@

2022-06-16 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
secdev-only problem, which is the reason why I send it to the list (I don't have that many lists subscribed, so my empirical data is limited ;-) Thanks and cheers, Lothar Kimmeringer

Re: Private Keys are cached "forever" leading to inop HTTP-TLS-servers

2022-06-16 Thread Lothar Kimmeringer
red. If they have to "repair themselves", it's a bug in the HSM's PKCS#11-library and I have to compose yet another bug-report ;-) A change in the TLS-implementation might still be considered (as a feature request that is) to discard the unuseable key to keep an application using this buggy library running. Thanks and best regards, Lothar Kimmeringer