> This takes a few test classes and moves them away from their current location
> in `test/jdk/java/security/testlibrary` to `test/lib/jdk/test/lib/security`,
> grouping them together with many other existing test utility classes. It
> also changes the dependent security tests to point at the n
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:23:59 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> This takes a few test classes and moves them away from their current location
> in `test/jdk/java/security/testlibrary` to `test/lib/jdk/test/lib/security`,
> grouping them together with many other existing test utility classes. It
> also
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:23:59 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> This takes a few test classes and moves them away from their current location
> in `test/jdk/java/security/testlibrary` to `test/lib/jdk/test/lib/security`,
> grouping them together with many other existing test utility classes. It
> also
This takes a few test classes and moves them away from their current location
in `test/jdk/java/security/testlibrary` to `test/lib/jdk/test/lib/security`,
grouping them together with many other existing test utility classes. It also
changes the dependent security tests to point at the new locat
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:46:03 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> > The reproducer you provided doesn't try to load KnownOIDs on my machine.
> > What am I missing?
> > Other than that, the change looks reasonable to me.
>
> Me neither and I'm using linux. Are you sure the Startup.java is right? Just
> cu
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:45:57 GMT, Johannes Graham wrote:
>> you are right, but accessing static field from enum constructor is not
>> allowed
>
> You could define the static field on another class, like SecurityConstants,
> and then use it in the enum constructor.
Creating a new empty string ar
