Re: RFR: 8347841: Test fixes that use deprecated time zone IDs [v2]

2025-01-16 Thread Justin Lu
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:42:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> test/jdk/java/util/TimeZone/TimeZoneBoundaryTest.java line 417: >> >>> 415: //findBoundariesStepwise(1997, ONE_DAY, >>> TimeZone.getTimeZone("EST"), 2); >>> 416: findBoundariesStepwise(1997, ONE_DAY, >>> TimeZone.getTimeZon

Re: RFR: 8347841: Test fixes that use deprecated time zone IDs [v2]

2025-01-16 Thread Justin Lu
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:45:54 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> This fix is a follow on for >> [JDK-8342550](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8342550). Replaces/Removes >> usages of those deprecated time zone ids in tests. > > Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional

Re: RFR: 8347841: Test fixes that use deprecated time zone IDs [v2]

2025-01-16 Thread Naoto Sato
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:54:04 GMT, Justin Lu wrote: >> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Removed extra spaces > > test/jdk/java/util/TimeZone/TimeZoneBoundaryTest.java line 417: > >> 415: //findBoundaries

Re: RFR: 8347841: Test fixes that use deprecated time zone IDs [v2]

2025-01-16 Thread Naoto Sato
> This fix is a follow on for > [JDK-8342550](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8342550). Replaces/Removes > usages of those deprecated time zone ids in tests. Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Removed extra spaces --

Re: RFR: 8347841: Test fixes that use deprecated time zone IDs

2025-01-16 Thread Justin Lu
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:38:48 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > This fix is a follow on for > [JDK-8342550](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8342550). Replaces/Removes > usages of those deprecated time zone ids in tests. Looks good. test/jdk/java/text/Format/DateFormat/DateFormatTest.java line 190:

RFR: 8347841: Test fixes that use deprecated time zone IDs

2025-01-16 Thread Naoto Sato
This fix is a follow on for [JDK-8342550](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8342550). Replaces/Removes usages of those deprecated time zone ids in tests. - Commit messages: - initial commit Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23166/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.o

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:49:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable >> classes in `java.base`. >> >> The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. >> >> Besides simply adding the `final` access modif

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:08:28 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/InterfaceAddress.java line 45: >> >>> 43: >>> 44: /* >>> 45: * Package private constructor. Can't be built directly, instances >>> are >> >> The comment is outdated. This constructor is actua

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:04:41 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: > Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable > classes in `java.base`. > > The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. > > Besides simply adding the `final` access modifier,

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:03:39 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable >> classes in `java.base`. >> >> The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. >> >> Besides simply adding the `final` access modifie

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:00:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable >> classes in `java.base`. >> >> The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. >> >> Besides simply adding the `final` access modifie

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:08:26 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: >> Thanks! Yes, that's good feedback. There are some non-API changes that I'd >> like to make, such as this and updating the comment for the >> `InterfaceAddress` constructor. >> >> I prefered to make the initial PR draft contain just the

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:55:50 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleDescriptor.java line 1318: >> >>> 1316: Version version, >>> 1317: Set modifiers, >>> 1318: Set requires, >> >> I assume y

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Alan Bateman
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:04:41 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: > Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable > classes in `java.base`. > > The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. > > Besides simply adding the `final` access modifier,

Re: RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:04:41 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: > Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable > classes in `java.base`. > > The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. > > Besides simply adding the `final` access modifier,

RFR: 8344943: Mark not subclassable classes final in java.base exported classes

2025-01-16 Thread Eirik Bjørsnøs
Please review this PR which adds the `final` modifier to non-subclassable classes in `java.base`. The classes were identified using an automated analysis. See CSR for details. Besides simply adding the `final` access modifier, the PR: * Updates a note in `java.lang.constant.DynamicCallSiteDesc`

Re: RFR: 8347506: Compatible OCSP readtimeout property with OCSP timeout

2025-01-16 Thread Hai-May Chao
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 22:41:47 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > This makes a small change to the default value of the > `com.sun.security.ocsp.readtimeout` System property. When not explicitly > specified, it will be set to the value of the `com.sun.security.ocsp.timeout` > System property, which help

Re: RFR: 8347506: Compatible OCSP readtimeout property with OCSP timeout

2025-01-16 Thread Sean Mullan
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 22:41:47 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > This makes a small change to the default value of the > `com.sun.security.ocsp.readtimeout` System property. When not explicitly > specified, it will be set to the value of the `com.sun.security.ocsp.timeout` > System property, which help

Re: RFR: 8261513: Various BasicConstraintsExtension issues

2025-01-16 Thread Ben Perez
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 20:07:36 GMT, Ben Perez wrote: > 8261513: Various BasicConstraintsExtension issues Re-opening PR - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20224#issuecomment-2596211696