> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
> unused warnings and addressed all of them by commenting out th
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:44:50 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote:
>> 1. If we got through the `bb.remaining() <= tagSize` arm, we're not going to
>> be encrypted. I think we are safe here.
>> 2. I would dump the alert level (fatal/warning) + reason.
>> 3. `bb` size definitely needs to be checked. e.g. i
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:04:51 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
> Please review a doc update to add `@spec` tags to crypto and security APIs in
> `java.base`.
>
> This was authored and proposed as #13336 by @jonathan-gibbons as part of an
> effort to [add `@spec` tags and an external specifications
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:29:45 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
>> Please review a doc update to add `@spec` tags to crypto and security APIs
>> in `java.base`.
>>
>> This was authored and proposed as #13336 by @jonathan-gibbons as part of an
>> effort to [add `@spec` tags and an external specifica
