Re: RFR: 8313367: SunMSCAPI cannot read Local Computer certs w/o Windows elevation [v5]

2024-08-14 Thread Weijun Wang
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:50:37 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote: >> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8313367: copyright updated > > I tried to follow the instructions to write a release note, but since this is >

Re: RFR: 8313367: SunMSCAPI cannot read Local Computer certs w/o Windows elevation [v5]

2024-08-14 Thread rebarbora-mckvak
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote: >> This fixes the defect described at >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367 >> >> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as >> read-only (instead of failing). >> >> Please note that permissions to

Re: RFR: 8313367: SunMSCAPI cannot read Local Computer certs w/o Windows elevation [v4]

2024-08-14 Thread Mat Carter
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:04:57 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> @wangweij , your [comment on >> JDK-8313367](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367?focusedId=14664542&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14664542) >> indicates you are unable to request a

Re: RFR: 8313367: SunMSCAPI cannot read Local Computer certs w/o Windows elevation [v4]

2024-08-14 Thread MustavData
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:35:01 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >>> But because of user privilege missing, the private key is not available and >>> it shows as a certificate entry. >> >> You can have applications that need a certificate (public key) only e.g. to >> verify signatures. This way you can use

Re: RFR: 8331008: Implement JEP 478: Key Derivation Function API (Preview) [v10]

2024-08-14 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:30:48 GMT, Kevin Driver wrote: >> Since it must be overridden, no way for the `UnsupportedOperationException` >> to happen? > > The text implies that implementations may throw > `UnsupportedOperationException` in their method body, even though they are > technically forc

Re: RFR: 8331008: Implement JEP 478: Key Derivation Function API (Preview) [v10]

2024-08-14 Thread Kevin Driver
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 01:06:52 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote: >> Kevin Driver has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 16 additional >> commits si

Re: RFR: 8331008: Implement JEP 478: Key Derivation Function API (Preview) [v10]

2024-08-14 Thread Kevin Driver
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:51:55 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote: >> Yes. We want the implementation to return the parameters, especially if it >> is supplying any defaults. > > Since it must be overridden, no way for the `UnsupportedOperationException` > to happen? The text implies that implementations m

RFR: 8338380: Update TLSCommon/interop/AbstractServer to specify an interface to listen for connections

2024-08-14 Thread Matthew Donovan
This is a small PR to extend the AbstractServer class in test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/TLSCommon/interop/ to enable users to specify a specific interface on which to listen for incoming connections. The default interface is now the loopback interface. The derived class, JdkServer, is also updated to u