Re: Status of project "Brisbane"?

2024-06-03 Thread Peter Firmstone
Hmm, makes me think of Bin Chickens... Project Bin Chick (cough) Brisbane.  Not as cool as "Blowfish", but hey we've got a lot of Ibis in here Brisbane, Aussies call them Bin Chickens. Cheers, Peter On 4/06/2024 1:03 am, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, What's the status of Project Brisbane? Acc

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Martin Balao
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 00:25:04 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote: >> Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet has updated the pull request with a new target >> base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the >> unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains >> ten addit

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Martin Balao
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 23:50:18 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote: >> Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet has updated the pull request with a new target >> base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the >> unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains >> ten addit

Re: RFR: 8333364: Minor cleanup could be done in com.sun.crypto.provider

2024-06-03 Thread Mark Powers
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:32:31 GMT, Mark Powers wrote: > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-864 This is the last cleanup bug. After integration, the umbrella bug can be closed. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19535#issuecomment-2146459913

RFR: 8333364: Minor cleanup could be done in com.sun.crypto.provider

2024-06-03 Thread Mark Powers
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-864 - Commit messages: - second iteration - first iteration Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19535/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19535&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-864 Stats:

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 29 May 2024 22:30:33 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose an implementation to support AES CBC with Ciphertext >> Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11, according to what has been specified in >> [JDK-8330843 CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-83308

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 29 May 2024 22:30:33 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose an implementation to support AES CBC with Ciphertext >> Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11, according to what has been specified in >> [JDK-8330843 CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-83308

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Martin Balao
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 21:49:58 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote: >> Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet has updated the pull request with a new target >> base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the >> unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains >> ten addit

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 29 May 2024 22:30:33 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose an implementation to support AES CBC with Ciphertext >> Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11, according to what has been specified in >> [JDK-8330843 CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-83308

Re: RFR: 8330842: Support AES CBC with Ciphertext Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11 [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 29 May 2024 22:30:33 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose an implementation to support AES CBC with Ciphertext >> Stealing (CTS) in SunPKCS11, according to what has been specified in >> [JDK-8330843 CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-83308

Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Matthew Donovan
On Thu, 23 May 2024 18:23:28 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> I renamed the method. >> >> I don't want to over-generalize the code when I don't know what we'll >> need/want in the future. The tests in this PR just create CA and end-entity >> certs and with a couple exceptions, the tests in this PR

Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v3]

2024-06-03 Thread Matthew Donovan
> For this PR, I identified TLS tests that can fail due to hard-code > certificates expiring. I updated those tests to use certificates that are > generated programmatically. This includes adding some helper methods to the > CertificateBuilder class to create builder objects with common default

Status of project "Brisbane"?

2024-06-03 Thread Volker Simonis
Hi, What's the status of Project Brisbane? According to [1], the Project was approved two month ago on April 4th, but until now I can't find it listed on openjdk.org nor can I find a corresponding mailing list? Best regards, Volker [1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/announce/2024-April/00035

Re: RFR: 8028127: Regtest java/security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java is incorrect [v2]

2024-06-03 Thread Fernando Guallini
> As highlighted in the bug description, The test > **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues: > > 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws > java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it > catches the exception, it never reache