On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:39:57 GMT, Ben Perez wrote:
>> Refactored PKCS9Attribute to use a hash map instead of multiple arrays. The
>> key for the hash map is an `ObjectIdentifier` and the values are a record
>> `AttributeInfo` that stores the information previously contained in the
>> arrays `PK
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:04:12 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Ben Perez has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Minor fixes to make the code more readable, inlined init(), removed
>> PKCS9Attributes.getAttributes()
>
> src/java.base/sh
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:39:57 GMT, Ben Perez wrote:
>> Refactored PKCS9Attribute to use a hash map instead of multiple arrays. The
>> key for the hash map is an `ObjectIdentifier` and the values are a record
>> `AttributeInfo` that stores the information previously contained in the
>> arrays `PK
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:39:57 GMT, Ben Perez wrote:
>> Refactored PKCS9Attribute to use a hash map instead of multiple arrays. The
>> key for the hash map is an `ObjectIdentifier` and the values are a record
>> `AttributeInfo` that stores the information previously contained in the
>> arrays `PK
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:46:54 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Ben Perez has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Minor fixes to make the code more readable, inlined init(), removed
>> PKCS9Attributes.getAttributes()
>
> src/java.base/s
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:44:01 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Ben Perez has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Minor fixes to make the code more readable, inlined init(), removed
>> PKCS9Attributes.getAttributes()
>
> src/java.base/sh
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:41:06 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `KEM.getInstance` now checks if the implementation is from a signed provider
> if it's not builtin to JDK.
>
> Several adjustments to the test:
> 1. Put one impl in `SunEC` to pretend it's builtin. This is necessary to test
> for provider s
> The various Zip/Jar-file related Java APIs have some long-standing
> differences or peculiarities with respect to the ZIP-file specification or
> compared to other implementations which should be documented in the API-doc.
> This documents the following:
> - Cache of JAR files in JarURLConnect
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:11:12 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> That would probably also involve taking existing documentation such as the
>> note about not opening entries with "."/"..", and the POSIX permissions
>> mappings? Would it make sense to split the rest of the changes in this PR
>> from th
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:23:18 GMT, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/ZipInputStream.java line 77:
>>
>>> 75: *
>>> 76: * Whenever possible, {@linkplain ZipFile} should be used for parsing
>>> ZIP
>>> 77: * archives since it correctly reads data from the ce
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:41:06 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `KEM.getInstance` now checks if the implementation is from a signed provider
> if it's not builtin to JDK.
>
> Several adjustments to the test:
> 1. Put one impl in `SunEC` to pretend it's builtin. This is necessary to test
> for provider s
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:42:58 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 87:
>>
>>> 85: }
>>> 86: if (cl.isEnum()) {
>>> 87: commitEvent(cl, SUID_NAME + " in an enum class is not
>>> effectiv
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:37:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review this PR to use modern APIs and language features to simplify
>> equals, hashCode, and compareTo for BigInteger. If you have any performance
>> concerns, please raise them.
>>
>> This PR is cherry-picked from a bigger, not-yet
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:37:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review this PR to use modern APIs and language features to simplify
>> equals, hashCode, and compareTo for BigInteger. If you have any performance
>> concerns, please raise them.
>>
>> This PR is cherry-picked from a bigger, not-yet
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:38:52 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due
>> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15
>> additional comm
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:15:36 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due
>> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15
>> additional comm
16 matches
Mail list logo
