On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:38:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> The associated JBS issue has been dormant for 6+ years and this is a very
>>> intrusive change affecting many, many files. Has the resurrection of this
>>> project previously been discussed somewhere?
>>
>> Hi @dholmes-ora,
>>
>> The wo
> This PR adds a new lint warning category `this-escape`.
>
> It also adds `@SuppressWarnings` annotations as needed to the JDK itself to
> allow the JDK to continue to compile with `-Xlint:all`.
>
> A 'this' escape warning is generated for a constructor `A()` in a class `A`
> when the compiler
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 18:48:51 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
>> recognized by JDK code yet.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs/SignerInfo.java line 540:
>
>> 538: }
>> 539:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:52:03 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
> recognized by JDK code yet.
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs/SignerInfo.java line 540:
> 538: }
> 539: if (keyAlg.equal
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:52:03 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
> recognized by JDK code yet.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ba03f42a
Author:Weijun Wang
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/ba
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:52:03 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
> recognized by JDK code yet.
Marked as reviewed by hchao (Committer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11883
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:52:03 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
> recognized by JDK code yet.
looks good
-
Marked as reviewed by ascarpino (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11883
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:52:03 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
> recognized by JDK code yet.
Marked as reviewed by kdriver (Author).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11883
Modern signature algorithms provided by a 3rd-party provider might not be
recognized by JDK code yet.
-
Commit messages:
- the fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11883/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=11883&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.or
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:38:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> The associated JBS issue has been dormant for 6+ years and this is a very
>>> intrusive change affecting many, many files. Has the resurrection of this
>>> project previously been discussed somewhere?
>>
>> Hi @dholmes-ora,
>>
>> The wo
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 14:49:16 GMT, Archie L. Cobbs wrote:
> Sounds reasonable... so I take it you would also be in favor of patching
> `make/modules` instead of adding `@SuppressWarnings` annotations
> everywhere... is that correct?
>
> If this is generally agreed as a better route then let me k
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 04:48:27 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> The associated JBS issue has been dormant for 6+ years and this is a very
> intrusive change affecting many, many files. Has the resurrection of this
> project previously been discussed somewhere?
Hi @dholmes-ora,
The work to add this war
* Updated the test for changes to the TLS implementation
* Test supports TLS 1.2 and 1.3
* Removed from ProblemList.txt
* Refactored code a bit
-
Commit messages:
- removed extra whitespace
- 8298869: Update ConnectionTest.java for changes to TLS implementation
Changes: https://git
13 matches
Mail list logo
