On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:29:08 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Maybe older X86 and AArch64 are our targets, since it is not guaranteed to
> have SHA hardware intrinsics?
Yes, the platforms that do not support SHA intrinsics are the targets. If I
read the OpenJDK CPU code correctly, RISC-V and AR
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:14:22 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> But you let me convinced that this may not be worthy of the effort.
Let's think about it and not discount it right away. 1% improvement on OpenJDK
scale is still quite significant, if we can show the non-interpreter modes
benefit fr
> Add a JFR Event for `java.security.Provider.getService(String type, String
> algorithm)` calls.
Sean Coffey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Correct Label annontation capitals
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:06:31 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the message digest implementation, for example SHA256, in JDK, two
>> bitwise operations could be improved with equivalent arithmetic, and then
>> the number bitwise operations could be reduced accordingly. Specifically
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 22:12:04 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the message digest implementation, for example SHA256, in JDK, two bitwise
> operations could be improved with equivalent arithmetic, and then the number
> bitwise operations could be reduced accordingly. Specifically
>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:23:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > Assuming we are set with the other changes, did you want to add the
> > following paragraph (or similar) at line 58 to make it clear that if the
> > Manifest is not found, then the JarEntry attributes will not be available:
>
> This is
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:08:21 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Assuming we are set with the other changes, did you want to add the following
> paragraph (or similar) at line 58 to make it clear that if the Manifest is
> not found, then the JarEntry attributes will not be available:
This is somethin
