On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:51:43 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> In case we read all bytes from an `InputStream` we don't need wrapping with
>> `BufferedInputStream` as the bytes are not written into internal buffer.
>> With removal of redundant buffer we save 8 kB of allocated memory.
>
> This is in se
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:06:10 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
> In case we read all bytes from an `InputStream` we don't need wrapping with
> `BufferedInputStream` as the bytes are not written into internal buffer. With
> removal of redundant buffer we save 8 kB of allocated memory.
Marked as reviewe
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:06:10 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
> In case we read all bytes from an `InputStream` we don't need wrapping with
> `BufferedInputStream` as the bytes are not written into internal buffer. With
> removal of redundant buffer we save 8 kB of allocated memory.
This is in securi
Thank you for the suggested solutions with an added attribute and a new
provider. Do you think it is something that could be contributed to the JDK, or
do you suggest this should be taken up as an external provider?
From: security-dev on behalf of Xuelei Fan
Se
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:42:18 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> We can skip bounds check and null check for Charset in case we use the array
>> entirely and the Charset is either default one or proven to be non-null.
>>
>> Benchmark results:
>>
>> before
>>
>> Benchmark
