Hello!
We've got a request to fix javadoc for SecureRandom, so that the example
code will read
byte[] bytes = new byte[20];
instead of
byte bytes[] = new byte[20];
I took opportunity to make all array declarations throughout
security-lib source code more of Java-style.
Would you please help
Looks good to me.. and is much easier to read now!
Regards,
Sean.
On 08/07/2015 16:35, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
We've got a request to fix javadoc for SecureRandom, so that the
example code will read
byte[] bytes = new byte[20];
instead of
byte bytes[] = new byte[20];
I took opportunity
On 08.07.2015 18:57, Seán Coffey wrote:
Looks good to me.. and is much easier to read now!
Thanks Seán for review!
I've missed some portion of update int the previous webrev.
Now, sending the whole changeset:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8130022/01/webrev/
Would you please take an
On 08.07.2015 18:57, Seán Coffey wrote:
Looks good to me.. and is much easier to read now!
Thanks Seán for review!
I've missed some portion of update int the previous webrev.
Now, sending the whole changeset:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8130022/01/webrev/
Would you please take an
On 08/07/2015 18:14, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
On 08.07.2015 18:57, Seán Coffey wrote:
Looks good to me.. and is much easier to read now!
Thanks Seán for review!
I've missed some portion of update int the previous webrev.
Now, sending the whole changeset:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8
ping ...
Xuelei
On 7/6/2015 9:11 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this simple fix.
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8130460/webrev.00/
>
> The DTLS test, javax/net/ssl/DTLS/CipherSuite.java, failed in nightly
> regression intermittent. In the test, it only allows 10 time
Greetings,
Xuelei wrote:
> I think Brad would consider our information for his design.
I did, and thanks for the all of the detailed discussion,
Simone/Michael/Xuelei. I've taken into account the feedback from the
previous discussion back in June. Here is v3 of the public ALPN API.
ht
Looks good.
Brad
On 7/8/2015 4:24 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
ping ...
Xuelei
On 7/6/2015 9:11 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review this simple fix.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8130460/webrev.00/
The DTLS test, javax/net/ssl/DTLS/CipherSuite.java, failed in nightly
regression int
Hello,
Please review a client/server test for SASL which uses different
mechanisms and QOPs.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049814
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/8049814/webrev.00/
Artem
On 7/9/2015 7:42 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
> Xuelei/Simone wrote:
>>> Per my understanding, application protocol should be negotiated before
>>> cipher suite and protocol version negotiated.
>>
>> This is not possible for HTTP/2.
>> Application protocol negotiation MUST happen *after* the TLS pro
Is the Verona repo sync'ed to the latest OpenJDK?
The webrev seems to be missing the provider JdkSASL inside the following
file
src/jdk.security.jgss/share/classes/com/sun/security/sasl/gsskerb/JdkSASL.java
The rest looks good.
Valerie
On 7/7/2015 10:48 AM, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi.
Please revi
Hi Iris
The change to S11N.java looks fine.
Thanks
Max
On 07/08/2015 01:48 AM, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi.
Please review changes to resolve the following bug:
8130696: Security Providers need to have their version numbers updated
for JDK 9 (Verona)
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-81
12 matches
Mail list logo
