Hi,
> well,
> I've just successfully installed RHEL5.11 and RHEL6.10 from i386 ISOs
> on virtio root disk + 64Gb RAM (upstream QEMU), and they booted
> to command prompt without any issues.
Oh, interesting. Apparently the physical address space is the same in
32-bit and long mode, i.e. on x86
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 04:57:35PM GMT, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:47:25PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> > well you just upgraded 'hardware' for legacy OS, there is no guaranties
> > that it will continue to work without any changes.
>
> Are you saying that seabios doesn't a
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 02:48:03PM GMT, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:08:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 01:29:11PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> >
> > > I'm leery of moving this heuristic to 64G of ram. I can understand
> > > the logic of >4G of ra
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:21:14AM GMT, John Levon wrote:
> Older 32-bit Linux VMs (including Ubuntu 16.10) have issues with the
> 64-bit pci io window, failing during boot with errors like:
Well. Why people would use *that* ubuntu version is not clear to me.
It's *loong* out of support. Eve
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:21:14AM GMT, John Levon wrote:
> > Older 32-bit Linux VMs (including Ubuntu 16.10) have issues with the
> > 64-bit pci io window, failing during boot with errors like:
>
> Turns out it apparently can't dea
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:05:17 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:21:14AM GMT, John Levon wrote:
> > Older 32-bit Linux VMs (including Ubuntu 16.10) have issues with the
> > 64-bit pci io window, failing during boot with errors like:
>
> Well. Why people would use *that* ub
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 01:37:24PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:21:14AM GMT, John Levon wrote:
> > > Older 32-bit Linux VMs (including Ubuntu 16.10) have issues with the
> > > 64-bit pci io window, failin
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am 20.06.24 um 19:29 schrieb Kevin O'Connor:
> > Some possible alternatives:
> >
> > * We could do nothing for now and continue to gauge how much of a
> >problem this is.
> >
> > * We could revert 96a8d130, and go back to explicit
Hi,
Dne 21. 06. 24 v 15:20 Igor Mammedov napsal(a):
+// Old linux kernels have trouble dealing with more than 44/46
+// phys-bits. Seems to be a bug in the virtio-pci driver.
+// 46: centos-7, ubuntu-18.04
+// 44: ubuntu-16.04
+//
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:29:45PM +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dne 21. 06. 24 v 15:20 Igor Mammedov napsal(a):
> > > +// Old linux kernels have trouble dealing with more than
> > > 44/46
> > > +// phys-bits. Seems to be a bug in the virtio-pci driver.
> > > +
10 matches
Mail list logo
