Hi all
I need something like this
__addressmod AREA_NAME;
AREA_NAME int var[10];
so I can do sdcc -b AREA_NAME=0xA000 ...
and place "var" (and possibly other variables) in special area, started at
0xA000. But its is not supported by SDCC so I made some patches to source
code and get it to work. I
I have this piece of code wont compile when I write:
sdcc test.c -mstm8 --std-sdcc11 --all-callee-saves --verbose --stack-auto
--fverbose-asm --float-reent --no-peep --debug
I get error "machine specific addressing or addressing mode error". Its
look like the generated assembly is not correct. Is
:51 schrieb Vahid Bashiri:
> > int func(void *var,int val);
> > typedef int (*SetVal)(void *, int);
> > typedef struct {
> > int val;
> > SetVal setval;
> > } my_struct;
> > int main()
> > {
> >
>
lve the problem. I hope someone correct me or the
source code.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Vahid Bashiri wrote:
> This is not the assembler.
> For first call generated code is: call #(_func + 0) which is not a valid
> stm8 assembly. For second call sdcc generates call (x) where x co
I did something like this some time ago. I am not sure about details but it
might be relevant to your problem.
create an assembly file and put your segment in order you want in it and
link it with the rest of your code. something like this:
.area RETAIN
.area DATA
.area space_a
.area
I'v seen exactly the same problem with "--out-fmt-elf" and "_naked". it
must be bug.
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:55 PM Basil Hussain wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have encountered an odd problem with sdasstm8 crashing. I believe I
> have narrowed it down to a particular set of circumstances, which are:
>
It looks like __bit only works for 8951. Any attempt to extend it to other
architectures ? I am particularly interested in stm8.
___
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
