Am 15.07.22 um 17:10 schrieb Maarten Brock:
Ok, so the proper way to 'escape' the # inside a macro definition is by
using another macro.
Yes. Just like other special characters, such as parentheses, etc.
That is fine by me. We should probably put this in the manual even
though it is standar
Hello All,
There is a pragma for disabling individual warnings by number. But seems like
no pragma
to restore its original state? pragma save/restore does not affect warnings?
--
Best regards,
Tonymailto:unt...@mail.ru
__
Tony Pavlov via Sdcc-user schreef op 2022-07-22 14:17:
Hello All,
There is a pragma for disabling individual warnings by number. But
seems like no pragma
to restore its original state? pragma save/restore does not affect
warnings?
Hello Tony,
No it doesn't. The mechanism used internally by S
Hello Maarten,
Friday, July 22, 2022, 3:26:47 PM, you wrote:
>> There is a pragma for disabling individual warnings by number. But
>> seems like no pragma
>> to restore its original state? pragma save/restore does not affect >
>> warnings?
MB> No it doesn't. The mechanism used internally by SDCC
Tony Pavlov via Sdcc-user schreef op 2022-07-22 14:33:
Hello Maarten,
Friday, July 22, 2022, 3:26:47 PM, you wrote:
There is a pragma for disabling individual warnings by number. But
seems like no pragma
to restore its original state? pragma save/restore does not affect >
warnings?
MB> No it
Am 22.07.22 um 16:11 schrieb Maarten Brock:
I don't know which are "the inline functions" nor which are "those
warnings".
Why not just fix what these warnings complain about?
From my experience: inline functions (i.e. functions declared inline)
are often called with constant parameters, r
Hello Maarten,
MB> I don't know which are "the inline functions" nor which are "those
warnings".
MB> Why not just fix what these warnings complain about?
i am not a true C developer, but:
inline uint8_t inline_some(uint8_t some) {
return (some) ? do_some_thing(some) : 0;
}
inline_some(0);
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:06:42 +0200
Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Dear SDCC users,
>
> you have chosen SDCC over non-free alternatives. I'm a bit interested in
> knowing the reasons. And also in knowing in which areas you think SDCC
> is lacking compared to non-free alternatives. Also: do you u
