On 30.10.21 21:48, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Am 30.10.21 um 20:14 schrieb Basil Hussain:
Okay, it's not just me:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53608761/cant-get-define-working-with-sdasz80-sdcc-assembler
So, apparently it *isn't* supported in SDAS? Why on earth is it
mentioned so freq
Am 31.10.21 um 03:49 schrieb Sebastian 'basxto' Riedel:
>
> Wasn’t the fork merged with updates from upstream at some point? It
> pretty much looked to me like docs from as were copied, but not all
> features merged. It also had .tile for asgb in docs, but not
> implemented, even though it wa
> linker situation. On the other hand, there might be an alternative: Use
> assemblers and linkers from GNU binutils (I think this would make it
> much easier to implement the link-time dead code elimination many users
> requested). But that would also be some effort, add an extra dependency,
> and
Hi!
Am 31.10.21 um 13:00 schrieb Alan Cox:
> [...]
> If anyone is going to do any of this can I put in a plea to also allow
> the object files to be recognized if ending ".o". The weird, non-standard
> naming is the biggest single problem I hit because it breaks all the Make
> implied rules and th
