Most probably because nobody was interested in taking up the challenge of
completing and maintaining it. Underlying reason is probably the existence
of avr-gcc.
Maarten
> But why AVR was abandoned?
> It is a polular kind of MCU.
>
>> On 10/12/10 9:13 AM, Claude Sylvain wrote:
>> > >I no
And WinAVR integrates pretty nicely into AVR studio I have used it several
times with good results.
Brian K. Mohlman
Principal Engineer Electrical – Controls
Advanced Technology & Application Engineering
JLG Industries Inc.
1 JLG Drive
McConnellsburg, PA. 17233
Ph. (717) 485-6495
mailto:bkmohl..
Value of AVR port of SDCC would be the significantly higher flexibility of SDCC
than GCC, in more then one aspect.
While avr-gcc one one side enjoys the massive investment of various companies
into GCC, e.g. through the aggressive early optimisations, it also suffers from
GCC being targeted pri
Hi,
I agree what you mention are valuable reasons.
and I don't have time either :(
Why not file a GSoC project to enhance this port LOL?
Sebastien
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Jan Waclawek wrote:
> Value of AVR port of SDCC would be the significantly higher flexibility of
> SDCC than GCC,
Hi,
I wonder if someone can help.
I'm using a PIC18F242 / PIC18F2420 and sdcc 2.9.0 and currently using
this code to pop things into EEPROM storage.
__code unsigned char __at( 0xf0 )
values[] = {
0x00, 0x01,
0x02, 0x03,
0x04, 0x05,
};
Unfortunately, when I use the EE
>>
>> On 10/11/2010 08:38 PM, Claude Sylvain wrote:
>>
>> Hello Borut,
>>
>>
>> - Forget my previous email about "sdcc-20101011-6022".
>> I was wrongly thinking that "sdcc-20101011-6022" was "sdcc-3.0.0-rc1".
>>
>> - I downloaded the right package ("sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc1.tar.bz2"), and
You need to build from the sdcc directory, not the sdcc/src directory.
./configure
make
note: make can take well over an hour, even more than 2 hours, on slower
dual core laptops
If you have all the needed dependencies installed, it should build just
fine. Then...
sudo make install
Bob Coc
