While trying to sort out my code that seems to have some sort of memory
allocation issue, I noticed the following following error (?) message
on the console.
(I usually compile from within Eclipse, so I've not noticed this
before):
Compiling with:
/usr/local/bin/sdcc -c "-Wl,-m,-s 18f4550.lkr" -
Hi All.
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 13:23 +0100, Martin Leopold wrote:
> Regarding the non-zero exit code, is that a result of the warnings?
Disregarding the ~ warnings, it turns out that the non-zero exit code
was a result of the use of non-initialised variable that produced an
assembler warning (that
Hi All.
As an intermediate step to check errors and perform cleanup and
optimisation I'm using a CIL derivative[1]. This produces a considerably
more readable and smaller program than the generated original. The
attached program is a simple serial port echo program produced first by
TinyOS+nesc and
Hi,
I cannot help you with the wrong behaviour, but the warnings are all
correct but can probably safely be ignored.
> The output from SDCC is:
> app.c:45: warning 166: useless declaration (possible use of keyword as
> variable name)
> app.c:46: warning 166: useless declaration (possible use of k
Hi All.
Continuing with the example I sent a few days ago I thought I might try
out the new (sort of at least) inline functionality. Unfortunately I'm
having some problems. TinyOS and code generator nescc produces code that
use inline extensively, but as far as i can tell it throws SDCC way off.
T
Error report
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:28 +0100, Martin Leopold wrote:
> Hi All.
> Continuing with the example I sent a few days ago I thought I might try
> out the new (sort of at least) inline functionality. Unfortunately I'm
> having some problems. TinyOS and code generator nescc produces code t
Ok, make it a const function pointer then. And to get
rid of the warning add a cast too:
void (* const fp)(void) = (void (*)(void))0xFFF0;
fp();
Now it's as small as the inline asm.
Maarten
> The resulting code using the C version generates this assembly instructions:
>
> mov _fp,#0xF0
>
I do not see these errors here, your report is probably fixed with SDCC 2.8.1
#5155
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1864577&group_id=599&atid=100599
Greetings,
Frieder
--
This SF.net email is sp
Maarten Brock schrieb:
> Ok, make it a const function pointer then. And to get
> rid of the warning add a cast too:
>
> void (* const fp)(void) = (void (*)(void))0xFFF0;
> fp();
Or directly:
((void (*)(void))0xFFF0)();
Greetings,
Frieder
--
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 19:29 +0100, Frieder Ferlemann wrote:
> I do not see these errors here, your report is probably fixed with SDCC 2.8.1
> #5155
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1864577&group_id=599&atid=100599
Darn, I forgot all about filing that bug report. I co
10 matches
Mail list logo
