://palmmicro.com/woody/
- Original Message -
From: "Lin Rongrong"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
>I downloaded 6816 snap build from http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php and
>found the same problem with 6848. Anywher
nt: Sunday, September 11, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
> Am 11.09.2011 03:39, schrieb Lin Rongrong:
>> Are those instructions already in current snap build?
>
> No. And even when implemented, they will require a command-line switch
> to enable.
Am 11.09.2011 03:39, schrieb Lin Rongrong:
> Are those instructions already in current snap build?
No. And even when implemented, they will require a command-line switch
to enable.
> I was going to try the 64bit build today. But after I upgraded current 32bit
> 6848 build from 6720 build (of Aug
Borut Razem"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
> The same build number should work the same on all platforms. Can you
> please try with the 32bit version from the same build to see if it works?
> Which 64bit platform yo
The same build number should work the same on all platforms. Can you
please try with the 32bit version from the same build to see if it works?
Which 64bit platform you are talking about? If it is WIN64, then you are
probably the first one using it...
Borut
On 09/11/2011 03:39 AM, Lin Rongrong
Are those instructions already in current snap build?
I was going to try the 64bit build today. But after I upgraded current 32bit
6848 build from 6720 build (of Aug 6), I found my Z80 program not working
normally. Any special changes recently?
Both --oldralloc and normal command line "-mz80 -c
On 09/03/2011 06:11 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Would you be interested in seeing support for some so-called
> undocumented Z80 instructions in sdcc? This would be available via a
> command-line switch, that would allow sdcc to generate the following:
>
> adc a, ir
> add a, ir
> and a, ir
> c
On 03/09/2011 13:20, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
> Am 03.09.2011 17:46, schrieb Claude Sylvain:
>>
>> - My personal opinion is that Z80 undocumented instructions
>> must not be used and supported, since no one can certify
>> their behaviour.
>>
>
> They are undocumented in the
Am 03.09.2011 17:46, schrieb Claude Sylvain:
>
> - My personal opinion is that Z80 undocumented instructions
>must not be used and supported, since no one can certify
>their behaviour.
>
They are undocumented in the original Z80, but there are Z80 variants,
like the T80 and NextZ80 out t
On 03/09/2011 06:11, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
> Would you be interested in seeing support for some so-called
> undocumented Z80 instructions in sdcc? This would be available via a
> command-line switch, that would allow sdcc to generate the following:
>
> adc a, ir
> add a, ir
> and
10 matches
Mail list logo
