Hi Maarten,
> I don't see why you assume BIT4 to be a signed char. I think it already is
> an int. But yes, after ~ it will certainly be an int.
I just guess that BIT4 is treated as signed char by looking into the
source code below,
-- SDCC.lex --
0[bB]{B}+{IS}?
Hello Chen,
I don't see why you assume BIT4 to be a signed char. I think it already is
an int. But yes, after ~ it will certainly be an int.
Maarten
> Hi All,
>
> I have the following code below, with "default" signed char type.
>
> ---
> #define BIT4 0b0001
> #define P
