Re: [Sdcc-user] Option to add a code section for every c function.

2016-01-18 Thread Vicente Sendra
El sáb, 16/1/16, Molnár Károly escribió: >On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:15:51 + (UTC) > >Vicente Sendra wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I've been using SDCC (PIC port) for some time and using gputils to assemble >> and link. >> >> Gplink has an option to remove dead sections -O2. >> >> It crashed when

Re: [Sdcc-user] Option to add a code section for every c function.

2016-01-16 Thread Molnár Károly
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:15:51 + (UTC) Vicente Sendra wrote: > Hello. > > I've been using SDCC (PIC port) for some time and using gputils to assemble > and link. > > Gplink has an option to remove dead sections -O2. > > It crashed when using this option, but recently i've repported the bug

Re: [Sdcc-user] Option to add a code section for every c function.

2016-01-13 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
On 13.01.2016 10:37, Maarten Brock wrote: > Hello Vicente, > > I recommend to post this as a feature request. Here in the user mailing > list it is most certain to be forgotten. […] Isn't this a way of implementing RFE #452? Philipp signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Sdcc-user] Option to add a code section for every c function.

2016-01-13 Thread Maarten Brock
Hello Vicente, I recommend to post this as a feature request. Here in the user mailing list it is most certain to be forgotten. Or even better, try to implement it yourself in pic(14/16)/gen.c and post the patch in the patch tracker. Greetings, Maarten > Hello. > > I've been using SDCC (PIC por

Re: [Sdcc-user] Option to add a code section for every c function.

2016-01-12 Thread Vicente Sendra
Hello. I've been using SDCC (PIC port) for some time and using gputils to assemble and link. Gplink has an option to remove dead sections -O2. It crashed when using this option, but recently i've repported the bug and it has been quickly fixed. (See details here: https://sourceforge.net/p/gput