Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-18 Thread Electropepper PIC
Problem solved guys and i do read the manual, the problem was another.Thank you all. On Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:24 PM, Raphael Neider wrote: I have tested this self-contained .c file successfully with the latest SDCC (compiled from svn): $ /media/data/local/sdcc-20141016/bin/

Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-16 Thread Raphael Neider
I have tested this self-contained .c file successfully with the latest SDCC (compiled from svn): $ /media/data/local/sdcc-20141016/bin/sdcc -v SDCC : mcs51/z80/z180/r2k/r3ka/gbz80/tlcs90/ds390/pic16/pic14/TININative/ds400/hc08/s08/stm8 3.4.1 #9088 (Oct 16 2014) (Linux) published under GNU General

Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-16 Thread Maarten Brock
Maybe it's time to start reading the manual. Search for the banksel keyword to find out what it's for and if it may have been renamed as well. > This is proving hard, the previous error is solved now i get: > sdcc  -mpic14 -p16f628a --use-non-free -L > /usr/local/share/sdcc/lib/src/pic14    ma

Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-16 Thread Electropepper PIC
This is proving hard, the previous error is solved now i get: sdcc  -mpic14 -p16f628a --use-non-free -L /usr/local/share/sdcc/lib/src/pic14    main.c   -o main main.c:59: syntax error: token -> 'banksel' ; column 9      

Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-16 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
On 16.10.2014 09:15, Electropepper PIC wrote: > I got the missing code, now i got the following error: > > sdcc -mpic14 -p16f628a --use-non-free -L > /usr/local/share/sdcc/lib/src/pic14main.c -o main > main.c:15: syntax error: token -> '0x20' ; column > 22

Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-16 Thread Electropepper PIC
I got the missing code, now i got the following error: sdcc  -mpic14 -p16f628a --use-non-free -L /usr/local/share/sdcc/lib/src/pic14    main.c   -o main main.c:15: syntax error: token -> '0x20' ; column 22     make: *

Re: [Sdcc-user] Missing definition for symbol

2014-10-15 Thread Molnár Károly
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:32:42 + (UTC) Electropepper PIC wrote: > I am trying to compile this header file > http://burningsmell.org/pic16f628/src/tsmdelay.h , > whit code : > #define KHZ 1000L > > #include > #include "tsmdelay.h" > #include "tsmtypes.h" > > /* Setup chip configuration */ >

Re: [Sdcc-user] missing definition for symbol "_SSPBUF", required by "strmmssp.o"

2009-02-01 Thread Raphael Neider
Hi, > Should I file a bug or not? No need to do that: I committed a workaroundish fix in SDCC r5352. Best regards, Raphael -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story.

Re: [Sdcc-user] missing definition for symbol "_SSPBUF", required by "strmmssp.o"

2009-01-29 Thread Kustaa Nyholm
Ok, thanks, now it is in the list archieve as google bait and answer! Should I file a bug or not? br Kusti >>> rnei...@web.de 29.1.2009 11:33 >>> Hi, > missing definition for symbol "_SSPBUF", required by "strmmssp.o" > Ok, so there is no SSPBUF in 4450 but I don't see where > __stream_mssp_

Re: [Sdcc-user] missing definition for symbol "_SSPBUF", required by "strmmssp.o"

2009-01-29 Thread Raphael Neider
Hi, > missing definition for symbol "_SSPBUF", required by "strmmssp.o" > Ok, so there is no SSPBUF in 4450 but I don't see where > __stream_mssp_putchar which refers to _SSPBUF > gets called? _SSPBUF is required by the MSSP putchar, referenced from stream_putchar, referenced from vfprintf, refe