Dear All,
Unfortunately for Sébastien, commercial software editors are really the
first who have all sorts of disclaimers in their licenses.
On top of that, only very few compilers are certified by a trustable
institution (only ADA to my knowledge).
Critical software depends therefore rather
On 14/02/2014 13:00, "Sebastien Lorquet" wrote:
>Hello
>
>I'm just saying that freedom is not a direct measure of quality, which is
>obvious but may have been a bit overlooked in the original post.
Hmm, the original question mentioned open source not freedom
and I tried to say that with open sou
Hello
I'm just saying that freedom is not a direct measure of quality, which is
obvious but may have been a bit overlooked in the original post.
About critical software, and by that I mean "someone could die because of bad
code" , you will need certified software, from the application you're writ
On 13/02/2014 16:56, "Sebastien Lorquet" wrote:
>yes, but that's only the bright side.
>
>Also,
>
>-developers are not often paid, so you have to wait until they have
>enough free time
That is true, then again you don't get a good service from
commercial player always either, especially the big
yes, but that's only the bright side.
Also,
-developers are not often paid, so you have to wait until they have enough free
time
-architecture changes are rare since it requires a lot of time to break big
things and rebuild them
-the number of contributors with enough skills and time to be abl
> using in safety-related embedded systems.
Open source has several advantages:
1) with open source you evaluate/validate compiler internals
which might me import if you take safety seriously
2) the tools cannot be discontinued, this has
happened to me with commercial tools in the p
Hi again,
>>If I understood you well, my original task (use IAR generated library in
>> SDCC) is also not feasible?
>
> Yes, it is not feasible.
Yup.
>> Do you know of any other C compiler that I might use as a replacement
>> for SDCC.
>
> Keil has already been mentioned.
And Raisonance. But fo
I'm not sure, that's why I'm asking. I haven't had much experience with
open source tools, so I'm not familiar with their reliability when using in
safety-related embedded systems. Thank you very much for the reply.
Sanita
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Kustaa Nyholm
wrote:
> >If I understo
>If I understood you well, my original task (use IAR generated library in SDCC)
>is also not feasible?
Yes, it is not feasible.
> Do you know of any other C compiler that I might use as a replacement for
> SDCC.
Keil has already been mentioned.
> Maybe choosing an open source compiler is not
Thank you very much for your replies.
If I understood you well, my original task (use IAR generated library in
SDCC) is also not feasible?
Do you know of any other C compiler that I might use as a replacement for
SDCC. I also need my project to be as safe and reliable as possible. Maybe
choosing a
Hello Sanita,
This is virtually impossible. There is no standard calling convention for
8051. Every compiler uses its own invention, be it IAR, Keil or SDCC.
AFAIK only Raisonance and Keil are compatible. On top of that every
compiler uses its own object and library format. IAR has no clue how to
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:23 +0100, Sanita Dobraca wrote:
>
> However, this does not work. When I add the library and try to build
> the project, I keep getting the error: "Fatal Error[e8]: Corrupt
> file. Unknown or misplaced tag encountered in module NO MODULE NAME
> ( C:\...\pstlib.lib ). Tag u
12 matches
Mail list logo
