On 22.09.2014 01:37, Drew DeVault wrote:
> […] and in a perfect
> world we'll make it self hosting.
>
> […]
>
> You are of course welcome to take anything you wish from our fork, and
> we'd be happy if any SDCC users wanted to come join us in making it better.
There are still a few missing stand
On 22.09.2014 01:37, Drew DeVault wrote:
> We would also like to refactor out
> the C++ code (and with it, the boost requirement), […]
Easy: Remove everything that uses tree decompositions; Remove the new
register allocator (the old one is still there, for --oldralloc), remove
lospre (GCSE is sti
On 09/23/2014 02:16 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> On 22.09.2014 01:37, Drew DeVault wrote:
>> Hi there! I wanted to let you guys know what us KnightOS folks
>> ended up doing with SDCC. You might remember my email a few
>> months ago asking about some of our concerns.
>>
>> […] - Removed unnec
On 22.09.2014 01:37, Drew DeVault wrote:
> Hi there! I wanted to let you guys know what us KnightOS folks ended up
> doing with SDCC. You might remember my email a few months ago asking
> about some of our concerns.
>
> […]
> - Removed unneccessary subsystems such as the simulator[…]
From an outi
