cylinder) etc - all so I can cross the finish line on time :-)
Steven Donegan
SSCC/NORC Life Member, Car #86
www.sscc.us
From: jon
To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Alte
> >
> > Just my 2c worth :-) Other may agree to differ
>
> Well...I work as a design engineer, usually on industrial control
> applications. Complexity is the enemy of stability, and unnecessary
> complexity is a design flaw...that's my usual mindset. Cost is often a
> secondary conside
On 08/31/2013 01:11 AM, jon wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 18:56 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
>> On 08/30/2013 02:20 PM, jon wrote:
Thanks to all that replied to my shockingly newbie question! I googled
more and found the answers I needed. I love SDCC! But all of my work
with SDCC so f
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 18:56 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 02:20 PM, jon wrote:
> >> Thanks to all that replied to my shockingly newbie question! I googled
> >> more and found the answers I needed. I love SDCC! But all of my work
> >> with SDCC so far has been Z80 because I've worked wi
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:58 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> An 8051 implementation that I've worked with a lot is the Philips/NXP
> P89C66x family. They have some on-chip "external" RAM.
I have used and still use the p89v664 which replaces the
p89c668. But nxp is a bad choice at the moment when it
c
On 08/30/2013 02:20 PM, jon wrote:
>> Thanks to all that replied to my shockingly newbie question! I googled
>> more and found the answers I needed. I love SDCC! But all of my work
>> with SDCC so far has been Z80 because I've worked with Z80 for well
>> over 25 years now.
>>
>> I wanted to switch
On 08/30/2013 02:18 PM, roelof 't Hooft wrote:
>> An 8051 implementation that I've worked with a lot is the Philips/NXP
>> P89C66x family. They have some on-chip "external" RAM.
>
> I have used and still use the p89v664 which replaces the
> p89c668. But nxp is a bad choice at the moment when it
>
IMHO - I would skip the effort of porting an IP-Stack to 8051
uC-Architecture if it is only about a small volume product and would use a
Hardware TCP/IP-Stack like W5500 from wiznet - and keep the sw simple.
According the STM8 - i am using the device in one of my projects and like
it very much 3,6
I've only lightly dabbled with them myself, but a trusted friend told
me he's found the STM8's peripherals to be a real weak spot, which is
unfortunate since the STM32 peripherals are pretty strong.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Am 30.08.2013 20:20, schrieb jon:
>
n entire OS and numerous ancillary hardware. That's not what I am building
this time around.
Mike
From: jon
To: Michael Hawkins ; sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Alternates to Atmel 89C55WD
Am 30.08.2013 20:20, schrieb jon:
> For small jobs I use Microchip PIC. I often combine an ARM board and
> PIC and offload anything real time parts onto the PIC then use a serial
> channel back to the ARM board for communication. The PIC had great real
> world I/O and in the years i've used them I
Am 30.08.2013 19:53, schrieb Michael Hawkins:
> Thanks to all that replied to my shockingly newbie question! I googled
> more and found the answers I needed. I love SDCC! But all of my work
> with SDCC so far has been Z80 because I've worked with Z80 for well over
> 25 years now.
>
> I wanted to s
numerous ancillary hardware. That's not what I am
> building this time around.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> From: jon
> To: Michael Hawkins ;
> sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 2:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sdcc
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 10:53 -0700, Michael Hawkins wrote:
> Thanks to all that replied to my shockingly newbie question! I googled
> more and found the answers I needed. I love SDCC! But all of my work
> with SDCC so far has been Z80 because I've worked with Z80 for well
> over 25 years now.
>
> I
On 08/30/2013 01:53 PM, Michael Hawkins wrote:
> Thanks to all that replied to my shockingly newbie question! I googled
> more and found the answers I needed. I love SDCC! But all of my work
> with SDCC so far has been Z80 because I've worked with Z80 for well over
> 25 years now.
>
> I wanted to
15 matches
Mail list logo
