://palmmicro.com/woody/
- Original Message -
From: "Lin Rongrong"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
>I downloaded 6816 snap build from http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php and
>found the same problem with 6848. Anywher
nt: Sunday, September 11, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
> Am 11.09.2011 03:39, schrieb Lin Rongrong:
>> Are those instructions already in current snap build?
>
> No. And even when implemented, they will require a command-line switch
> to enable.
Am 11.09.2011 03:39, schrieb Lin Rongrong:
> Are those instructions already in current snap build?
No. And even when implemented, they will require a command-line switch
to enable.
> I was going to try the 64bit build today. But after I upgraded current 32bit
> 6848 build from 6720 build (of Aug
Borut Razem"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
> The same build number should work the same on all platforms. Can you
> please try with the 32bit version from the same build to see if it works?
> Which 64bit platform yo
normal command line "-mz80 -c --std-c99 --codeseg CODE"
> have the same problem.
>
> Woody
>
> http://palmmicro.com/woody/
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Philipp Klaus Krause"
> To: "Sdcc-User"
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 201
80 -c --std-c99 --codeseg CODE"
have the same problem.
Woody
http://palmmicro.com/woody/
- Original Message -
From: "Philipp Klaus Krause"
To: "Sdcc-User"
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 6:11 PM
Subject: [Sdcc-user] Undocumented Z80 instructions
>
On 09/03/2011 06:11 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Would you be interested in seeing support for some so-called
> undocumented Z80 instructions in sdcc? This would be available via a
> command-line switch, that would allow sdcc to generate the following:
>
> adc a, ir
> add a, ir
> and a, ir
> c
On 03/09/2011 13:20, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
> Am 03.09.2011 17:46, schrieb Claude Sylvain:
>>
>> - My personal opinion is that Z80 undocumented instructions
>> must not be used and supported, since no one can certify
>> their behaviour.
>>
>
> They are undocumented in the
Am 03.09.2011 17:46, schrieb Claude Sylvain:
>
> - My personal opinion is that Z80 undocumented instructions
>must not be used and supported, since no one can certify
>their behaviour.
>
They are undocumented in the original Z80, but there are Z80 variants,
like the T80 and NextZ80 out t
On 03/09/2011 06:11, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
> Would you be interested in seeing support for some so-called
> undocumented Z80 instructions in sdcc? This would be available via a
> command-line switch, that would allow sdcc to generate the following:
>
> adc a, ir
> add a, ir
> and
Would you be interested in seeing support for some so-called
undocumented Z80 instructions in sdcc? This would be available via a
command-line switch, that would allow sdcc to generate the following:
adc a, ir
add a, ir
and a, ir
cp a, ir
inc ir
ld ir, ir'
ld ir, n
ld ir, r
ld r, ir
or a, ir
sbc a
11 matches
Mail list logo
