Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC 2.4.0 vs 2.6.0 Interrupt Vector Table Generation....

2006-10-02 Thread Jesus Calvino-Fraga
Hummm, for some reason the quoted message below arrived twice into my mailbox. I just realized it after writing the answer/example that follows. Anyhow, here it is. It may be useful to somebody. As Maarten Brock said in another message, you can just add a dummy interrupt function to set the

[Sdcc-user] SDCC 2.4.0 vs 2.6.0 Interrupt Vector Table Generation....

2006-10-02 Thread Jon Hallsten
Hello all SDCC users & developers, being that the 8051 is in your area of expertise, I wanted to ask your thoughts on the following issue I have been having I have poured through the message boards to no avail.  My question is very unique.   I built a boot loader using SDCC 2.4.0 for th

Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC 2.4.0 vs 2.6.0 Interrupt Vector Table Generation....

2006-09-30 Thread Maarten Brock
Hi Jon, The claim for 2.4.0 meant it would increase the interrupt vector table when necessary. If you want 2.6.0 to generate a table of constant size I recommend to put an empty interupt service routine for the highest interrupt number in every project. Or even one number higher if you don't

[Sdcc-user] SDCC 2.4.0 vs 2.6.0 Interrupt Vector Table Generation....

2006-09-30 Thread Jon Hallsten
Hello all SDCC users & developers, being that the 8051 is in your area of expertise, I wanted to ask your thoughts on the following issue I have been having I have poured through the message boards to no avail.  My question is very unique.   I built a boot loader using SDCC 2.4.0 for t