all on one page.
Thank you once more.
br Kusti
From: Raphael Neider [rnei...@web.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:25 AM
To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Larger than 256 byte arrays in PIC16
Hi Kustaa,
> Yes, this
Hi Kustaa,
Yes, this is sort of what I was looking for, but this did not completely
answer the question.
My array is not malloc'ated but is a global variable. I've not changed
the default linker script and the compiler and linker seem to be happy.
This is strange: The attached source should
Re: [Sdcc-user] Larger than 256 byte arrays in PIC16
Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any issues I should now about if I use an array larger than one
> page (256) bytes on PIC18F4550? Specifically this is an array of four
> structs. Each struct is about 70 bytes so this will
Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any issues I should now about if I use an array larger than one
> page (256) bytes on PIC18F4550? Specifically this is an array of four
> structs. Each struct is about 70 bytes so this will slightly 'overflow'
> one page. The seemst of compile but I've not y
Hi,
are there any issues I should now about if I use an array larger than one
page (256) bytes on PIC18F4550? Specifically this is an array of four
structs. Each struct is about 70 bytes so this will slightly 'overflow'
one page. The seemst of compile but I've not yet had the opportunity to test
i
