Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

On 5/7/07, Raphael Neider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The .ignore files instruct the Makefiles not to build certain subdirectories (adc, i2c, usart) for some PIC16 devices---those that do not sport the required SFRs/functionality. Nope, *.ignore cannot be ignored ;-). Though this is probably ca

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

Hi, > It seemed that the make process could not find some files. Any Idea what > those missing file suppose to do. I see the file name is somekind of > ...ignore. Do we suppose to ignore this file? The .ignore files instruct the Makefiles not to build certain subdirectories (adc, i2c, usart) for

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

Done. Can you verify if everything compiles OK on OpenBSD? Hello Borut, Sorry, I have been very busy in office for last couple days. I have just compiled the latest sourcecode of sdcc, and I got following problem when it came to compiling /device/lib/pic and device/lib/pic16. I only get pic.l

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

soliton wrote: > On 4/30/07, *soliton* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > The reason is that the mostly used sdcc development platforms > are Linux > and Windows + (cygwin or mingw), where the default shell is bash. > > Can you please repl

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

On 4/30/07, soliton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason is that the mostly used sdcc development platforms are Linux > and Windows + (cygwin or mingw), where the default shell is bash. > > Can you please replace lines > > SHELL = bash > > with > > SHELL = sh > > in device/lib/pic16/Makefile

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

The reason is that the mostly used sdcc development platforms are Linux and Windows + (cygwin or mingw), where the default shell is bash. Can you please replace lines SHELL = bash with SHELL = sh in device/lib/pic16/Makefile.common.in and device/lib/pic/Makefile.common.in and try to rebuild

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

soliton wrote: > BTW, I just switched to bash and make the library. The lib/pic had > been done. The lib/pic16 is in progress, from the progress i could > tell it will be successfully compiled as well. > Just wonder, why the makefile use bash instead of generic shell > command. Therefore we coul

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

On 4/27/07, Xiaofan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/27/07, soliton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are right. I had problem installing FreeBSD on my old compaq PC, it > would not install, which made me switch to openbsd. I thought it has the > same flavor, BSD. :) By the way how is your p

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

On 4/27/07, soliton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are right. I had problem installing FreeBSD on my old compaq PC, it > would not install, which made me switch to openbsd. I thought it has the > same flavor, BSD. :) By the way how is your progress with Pickit2 and > FreeBSD? > -- It is workin

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

On 4/27/07, Xiaofan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gmake: bash: Command not found > gmake: *** [recurse] Error 127 Just an obvious question, do you have bash installed? I believe by default the BSDs do not use Bash. I have FreeBSD installed and SDCC can be built without a problem. I usual

Re: [Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

On 4/27/07, soliton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to built SDCC in OpenBSD Box. The sdcc/bin directory succesfully > filled with all sdcc binary executable, but I could not get the > sdcc/device/lib/pic and sdcc/device/lib/pic16 to compile. I got the > following error messages: > > gmake: ba

[Sdcc-user] Building SDCC in OpenBSD

I tried to built SDCC in OpenBSD Box. The sdcc/bin directory succesfully filled with all sdcc binary executable, but I could not get the sdcc/device/lib/pic and sdcc/device/lib/pic16 to compile. I got the following error messages: gmake: bash: Command not found gmake: *** [recurse] Error 127 Doe