Re: [Sdcc-user] Hello and question

2008-06-09 Thread dementeddigital
eryone. I'm new to SDCC, and I could use a nudge in the right direction. I have installed the latest snapshot (sdcc-20080609-5192-setup.exe) under Win XP (SP2) and also the latest GPUtils. I've created a very basic project for the PIC12F675, consisting of a main.h and a main.c. The too

[Sdcc-user] Hello and question

2008-06-09 Thread dementeddigital
Hello everyone. I'm new to SDCC, and I could use a nudge in the right direction. I have installed the latest snapshot (sdcc-20080609-5192-setup.exe) under Win XP (SP2) and also the latest GPUtils. I've created a very basic project for the PIC12F675, consisting of a main.h and a m

Re: [Sdcc-user] simulating

2008-06-09 Thread Get Started
I tested it with p16f84 in PIC Simulator IDE previously... On 6/9/08, Raphael Neider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> OK, I reproduced the error using oshonsoft's PIC simulator. I solved it >>> by selecting the correct PIC (16f84) rather than using the simulator's >>> default (16f877), which mes

Re: [Sdcc-user] simulating

2008-06-09 Thread Raphael Neider
>> OK, I reproduced the error using oshonsoft's PIC simulator. I solved it >> by selecting the correct PIC (16f84) rather than using the simulator's >> default (16f877), which messes up the software (pseudo) stack: the > > It means, it is fixed in the source code? I have to download the > latest

Re: [Sdcc-user] simulating

2008-06-09 Thread Get Started
On 6/8/08, Raphael Neider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Instructions counter: 94 >> Clock cycles counter: 484 >> Last instruction: call 0xAC > > OK, I reproduced the error using oshonsoft's PIC simulator. I solved it > by selecting the correct PIC (16f84) rather than using the simulator's > defau