[screen-devel] build patch

2008-10-05 Thread William Pursell
I'd like to start working on some of the bugs to help get the next release out, but I think there is quite a bit of basic cleanup that needs to be done in the code base. As a step towards that, here are a few patches. (They have little or nothing to do with cleaning up the code, though.) I think

[screen-devel] refactor

2008-10-05 Thread William Pursell
Here's a "janitorial" patch of the type I mentioned in my last mail. A few questions: Is it necessary to continue using old K&R style parameter declarations? Would there be any problems dumping the obsolete Makefile.in's and using Automake? I notice there is neither a 'check' nor a 'test' tar

Re: [screen-devel] refactor

2008-10-05 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 William Pursell wrote: > > Here's a "janitorial" patch of the type I > mentioned in my last mail. A few questions: > > Is it necessary to continue using old K&R style > parameter declarations? My feeling is no, but we should get confirmation from J

Re: [screen-devel] refactor

2008-10-05 Thread Juergen Weigert
On Oct 05, 08 11:23:01 -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > William Pursell wrote: Hey William, welcome to screen! > > Here's a "janitorial" patch of the type I > > mentioned in my last mail. A few questions: > > > > Is it necessary to continue using

Re: [screen-devel] [PATCH] Make RC_OTHER always choose some other

2008-10-05 Thread Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
* Sadrul Habib Chowdhury had this to say on [19 Sep 2008, 03:48:08 -0400]: > * Jeroen Roovers had this to say on [18 Sep 2008, 18:52:11 +0200]: > [snip] > > Sometimes when you do RC_OTHER, you get presented with "This IS window (n)." > > That's rather stupid as you didn't even ask for window n in t