well, a couple of points:
- no, I'm looking for pattern matching, not tab completion. I don't
want to have to remember my screen name being:
vim /path/to/very/long/file
where I could have several of these in different screens.
- the usage (of both pattern matching and multi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Peschko wrote:
> ok -
>
> so with select, you can switch to buffers matching a given pattern? Is
> that correct? I only see window name or number, not pattern..
Yes, there's currently not support for pattern (I suppose you're really
asking for
ok -
so with select, you can switch to buffers matching a given pattern? Is
that correct? I only see window name or number, not pattern..
If it can use a pattern, the only thing missing (that I was asking for
- would be to be able to search across multiple buffers with a single
search.
Is this o
On Oct 20, 08 19:53:28 -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. Named buffers. right now, there is only one buffer in vim.
> >
> > I assume you mean "in screen" since vim has buffers available for
> > essentially every printable character, yes?
>
> yes.. that's correct.
>
> Anyways, thanks for t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Peschko wrote:
> hey all,
>
> I'm *very* glad that screen seems to have risen from the dead; it's
> one of my favorite tools by far and has saved me tons of time over the
> years.
>
> However, there are a couple of features that I think would
>>
>> 1. Named buffers. right now, there is only one buffer in vim.
>
> I assume you mean "in screen" since vim has buffers available for
> essentially every printable character, yes?
yes.. that's correct.
Anyways, thanks for the tip on redefining the main meta character..
with multiple buffers,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Edward Peschko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey all,
>
> I'm *very* glad that screen seems to have risen from the dead; it's
> one of my favorite tools by far and has saved me tons of time over the
> years.
>
> However, there are a couple of features that I think w
