Feel free to get inspired from this:
https://github.com/hhorak/mock-example
Honza
On 03/10/2016 08:00 AM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Please share:)
Bryan Seitz
Original message
From: Honza Horak
Date: 3/10/16 1:40 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: sclorg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [scl.org] Docker
My problem is that I can't be sure that packages built with mock dist el6 or
el7 also work in Oracle Linux, which we use at work for some systems. With
docker, I can be sure that they'll work.
Regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@
Sure, for testing Docker is probably good alternative.
Honza
On 03/10/2016 02:08 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
My problem is that I can't be sure that packages built with mock dist el6 or
el7 also work in Oracle Linux, which we use at work for some systems. With
docker, I can be sure that they'
On 22/02/16 14:17, Dominic Cleal wrote:
> I'm happy to announce test packages of a new Ruby on Rails 4.2
> collection are available from the CentOS Software Collections SIG.
>
> These are modelled on previous collections (e.g. rh-ror41) and provide
> all of Rails with full asset compilation suppor
On 03/08/2016 01:17 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Thanks, I will try once I find some time to do it.
If I decide to change something, I'll fork your repo to my own github
account and will send you a pull request.
Just to let you know:
first CBS builds arrived:
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/pack
Another thing... Why build git 2.5, when 2.7.2 is available in source?
Best regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jarek Polok [mailto:jaroslaw.po...@cern.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2016 16:35
An: Souvignier, Daniel ; sclorg@redhat.com
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [scl.org] N
On 03/10/2016 05:26 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Another thing... Why build git 2.5, when 2.7.2 is available in source?
We have a requirement for git 2.X > 2.0 , and 2.5 was
readily available from Fedora (23) repos - which makes
it easy to adapt for SCLo .. but no other reasons than
this (in
