On 03/10/2016 05:26 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Another thing... Why build git 2.5, when 2.7.2 is available in source?
We have a requirement for git 2.X > 2.0 , and 2.5 was
readily available from Fedora (23) repos - which makes
it easy to adapt for SCLo .. but no other reasons than
this (in
Another thing... Why build git 2.5, when 2.7.2 is available in source?
Best regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jarek Polok [mailto:jaroslaw.po...@cern.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2016 16:35
An: Souvignier, Daniel ; sclorg@redhat.com
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [scl.org] N
On 03/08/2016 01:17 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Thanks, I will try once I find some time to do it.
If I decide to change something, I'll fork your repo to my own github
account and will send you a pull request.
Just to let you know:
first CBS builds arrived:
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/pack
On 22/02/16 14:17, Dominic Cleal wrote:
> I'm happy to announce test packages of a new Ruby on Rails 4.2
> collection are available from the CentOS Software Collections SIG.
>
> These are modelled on previous collections (e.g. rh-ror41) and provide
> all of Rails with full asset compilation suppor
Sure, for testing Docker is probably good alternative.
Honza
On 03/10/2016 02:08 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
My problem is that I can't be sure that packages built with mock dist el6 or
el7 also work in Oracle Linux, which we use at work for some systems. With
docker, I can be sure that they'
My problem is that I can't be sure that packages built with mock dist el6 or
el7 also work in Oracle Linux, which we use at work for some systems. With
docker, I can be sure that they'll work.
Regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@
Feel free to get inspired from this:
https://github.com/hhorak/mock-example
Honza
On 03/10/2016 08:00 AM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Please share:)
Bryan Seitz
Original message
From: Honza Horak
Date: 3/10/16 1:40 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: sclorg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [scl.org] Docker
