Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-08 Thread Peter Tomlinson
On 7 June 2001 Carlos Prados wrote > Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question > > Hi, > > > It seems, therefore, that changing the value of Di > > in the ATR does not > > change the value of the wwt, but changing the value > > of Fi does. Is this what > >

Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-07 Thread Carlos Prados
Hi, Thanks Peter for your great explanation. > 7816-3:1997 section 8.2 on work waiting time: > > wwt = 960 * WI * (Fi / f) > This is exactly what I get doning variable substitution and symplification in the formula that comes in ISO 7816-3: 1992. [snip] > It seems, therefore, that changing

Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-02 Thread Peter Tomlinson
Carlos, Use the current (1997) edition of 7816-3, not the obsolete (1989) edition. Its still not easy to do the calculations, so readers of this note should check it over carefully. 7816-3:1997 section 8.2 on work waiting time: wwt = 960 * WI * (Fi / f) f = card clock frequency - let us assume

Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-02 Thread Jim Rees
I'm not sure how to calculate this value when etu = 1/9600 s (default value when there is no PTS): My interpretation of 7816-3 is that it should be a) wwt = 960 * WI * F / 3571200 But I could be wrong. In particular, Cyberflex almost always requires a longer wwt, and I usually set my own