Re: MUSCLE Smart cards for IPsec

1999-02-15 Thread remo tabanelli
David Corcoran wrote: > [Cassidy, Derick] > On the topic of Linux support for Entrust... I have been after > them for years to do just this. Perhaps if everyone were to send a > message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this request, we could go a long way > to getting these toolkits po

MUSCLE Smart cards for IPsec

1999-02-09 Thread Paul Pomes
I've been researching smart cards for three weeks and the roles of the interlocking standards (ISO-7816, Open Card, PC/SC, PKCS #7, #11, etc) are finally becoming clear. Please excuse me if this has already been hashed to death, however smart cards interfaced through PC/SC look to be a good match

Re: MUSCLE Smart cards for IPsec

1999-02-09 Thread David Corcoran
[Cassidy, Derick] On the topic of Linux support for Entrust... I have been after them for years to do just this. Perhaps if everyone were to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this request, we could go a long way to getting these toolkits ported. Most of what peo

Re: MUSCLE Smart cards for IPsec

1999-02-09 Thread Jeremy Impson
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Paul Pomes wrote: > I've been researching smart cards for three weeks and the roles of the > interlocking standards (ISO-7816, Open Card, PC/SC, PKCS #7, #11, etc) > are finally becoming clear. Please excuse me if this has already been > hashed to death, however smart cards i

Re: MUSCLE Smart cards for IPsec

1999-02-09 Thread David Corcoran
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Paul Pomes (QualComm) wrote: > I've been researching smart cards for three weeks and the roles of the > interlocking standards (ISO-7816, Open Card, PC/SC, PKCS #7, #11, etc) > are finally becoming clear. Please excuse me if this has already been > hashed to death, however sm

MUSCLE Smart Cards

1998-09-20 Thread Franco M. Romito
Dave, you are a friend :-) *** Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html *