Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-23 Thread David Corcoran
Hello, Esben has provided a patch to look at for pcsc-lite-0.9.1 for autoconf/automake. It was too large (>4000 chars) so it bounced to me. It can be viewed at: http://www.linuxnet.com/middleware/files/patch-pcsc.txt Thanks to everyone for their help. Dave ***

Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-23 Thread Axel Heider
Hi Matthias, > I'm preparing RPMs for SuSE Linux, and I run "./reconf", too, > because I got some problems with the original distributed files. > (we are using automake 1.4 and autoconf 2.13, too). Wird die MUSCLE Software+Treiber in der nächste Version von SuSE Linux dabie sein? -- Mit freun

Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-23 Thread Matthias Eckermann
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:25:57PM +0200 Esben Haabendal Soerensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >From src/Makefile.am: > > libpcsclite_core_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:2:0 -lfl -ldl > libpcsclite_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:1:0 > > How much thought have been put into the above library version

Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-23 Thread Esben Haabendal Soerensen
>From src/Makefile.am: libpcsclite_core_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:2:0 -lfl -ldl libpcsclite_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:1:0 How much thought have been put into the above library versioning ? A good description of what the numbers mean can be found in the "Versioning" section of the libtool

Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-23 Thread Matthias Eckermann
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:32:47AM +0200 Esben Haabendal Soerensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Yes, something is wrong with the top-level Makefile.in in > pcsc-lite-0.9.1. But there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the > Makefile.am (although it needs some cleanup). If I run the ./rec

Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-23 Thread Esben Haabendal Soerensen
Carlos Prados <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just a suggestion: for distributting clean tar.gz > source packages with only system-independent files > (f.i. without generated makefiles, dependencies and > configurations that are created on you machine), you > should run: > > $ make distcheck > >

Re: MUSCLE new software

2001-04-21 Thread Carlos Prados
Hi, I see the package finally includes autoconf/automake stuff. I congratulate for it :-) Just a suggestion: for distributting clean tar.gz source packages with only system-independent files (f.i. without generated makefiles, dependencies and configurations that are created on you machine), you

MUSCLE new software

2001-04-20 Thread David Corcoran
Hello, I released some new software. pcsc-lite-0.9.1 - This one is good - there is no rpc, it is stable, and more secure. This one uses 2 named pipes owned by pcscd. The one is for writing from the app and the 2nd is owned temporarily read only by the user of the app. This version is very sta

Re: MUSCLE New Software

1999-12-14 Thread David Corcoran
This is correct. The resource manager is now included with pcsc-lite. I removed pcsc-full because it was very large and hard to maintain and I didn't write it in a modular fashion so it could be broken apart depending on what features were wanted. Lite compiles in about 10 seconds compared to

Re: MUSCLE New Software

1999-12-14 Thread Alwyn Schoeman
Hi, I see that the middleware software section only lists the pcsc-lite version 0.4.0, does that mean that the resource manager is now included in the pcsc-lite distribution? What and where is pcsc-full? Thanx David Corcoran wrote: > Hello, > > I released some new software on the site. pcsc-

Re: MUSCLE New Software

1999-12-14 Thread Alwyn Schoeman
Hi, I see that the middleware software section only lists the pcsc-lite version 0.4.0, does that mean that the resource manager is now included in the pcsc-lite distribution? What and where is pcsc-full? Thanx David Corcoran wrote: > Hello, > > I released some new software on the site. pcsc-

MUSCLE New Software

1999-12-13 Thread David Corcoran
Hello, I released some new software on the site. pcsc-lite-0.4.0 is released with stable RPC, support for multiple slots on the same terminal, allows connections to multiple simultaneous readers and resource managers. I fixed the SCardStatus function so all the functions are now compliant to th