ood idea
> > to use such policy. Why to protect such thing ??
> >
> > A good policy is to setup a box and to have a model earning
> > money on services not on the boxes or the system (linux).
> >
> > The user can do what ever he/she wants to do, if the user
> &
after a cheap hack
(software only, for example), don't use it as we want them to use it.
We are not going the sell remote controls for nuclear missiles that must only
allow the targeting of the bad guys! ;-)
---
-°) Patrick Valsecchi
/\\
_\_vhttp:/
tment
> Lockheed Martin Systems Integration
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> phone: 607-751-5618
> fax: 607-751-6025
>
> ***
> Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
> (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux E
kernel to the card,
> that
> would be silly. Just ship the signed crc to the card for checking.
>
> I'm a little curious about the legal aspects. This certainly seems to
> go
> against the spirit of the GPL. But technically it's probably legal.
> The
> us
;
> --
> Michael Graffam ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
> *******
> Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
> (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
> http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
> ***
't be just simple tricks, we must protect those boxes against
very skilled hackers.
Is there existing projects on those subjects? Is anybody already worked on it?
Thanks for your help.
---
-°) Patrick Valsec
