When I reported this problem with Bash last year, I looked at the Gnu
website for information on how to contribute and report bugs. And
although the man page is exactly what you show, the website still direct
it diferently - and maybe it is nearly the same I saw last year: "For
development sources,
Hello,
On 06/02/2015 09:42 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 07:26 -0400, Julian Marchant wrote:
I think you may be projecting an impression you have on a few Savannah
projects onto the entire Savannah site.
<...>
I think the more accurate statement is that there are a few projects
Yes. I knew it was off-topic. Looking for activity in other projects, me and a
few friends also found that Savannah seemed a bit unused. This is why I decided
to post here. Sorry for this.
I'll check the other list, and its answer. I'll recheck why I didn't see it,
since it has an answer.
Than
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 07:26 -0400, Julian Marchant wrote:
> I think you may be projecting an impression you have on a few Savannah
> projects onto the entire Savannah site. I'm sure there are some
> projects on Savannah which are inactive.
I think the more accurate statement is that there are a fe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2015 06:03 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> So. Why it seems to be not much activity on Savannah website? I'm
> not the only who noted this, and this question isn't only about
> Bash - it shouldn't be, although Bash is the starting point.
My projects
So. Why it seems to be not much activity on Savannah website? I'm not
the only who noted this, and this question isn't only about Bash - it
shouldn't be, although Bash is the starting point.
I didn't read the other message because it is among a bunch of spam, and
apparently I skimmed throught its
