On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:46:13PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>> Sylvain Beucler writes:
>> >> Would a FLOSS project using CUDA be accepted on savannah.nongnu.org?
>> >
>> > Independently of GPL compatibility, Savannah only accepts projects
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:00:29AM -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>
> >Free software users mustn't be enticed to use proprietary software.
> >If there are multiple backends, the best (or equal-best) backend must
> >rely on free software. If CUDA is a suboptimal (or equal
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> What if CUDA isn't a dependency per-se, but rather one of several
>> backends?
>
> Free software users mustn't be enticed to use proprietary software.
> If there are multiple backends, the best (or equal-best) backend must
> rely on free so
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Free software users mustn't be enticed to use proprietary software.
If there are multiple backends, the best (or equal-best) backend must
rely on free software. If CUDA is a suboptimal (or equal-best)
backend, that's ok. If CUDA is a better backend than a free software
al
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:46:13PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler writes:
> >> Would a FLOSS project using CUDA be accepted on savannah.nongnu.org?
> >
> > Independently of GPL compatibility, Savannah only accepts projects
> > that work without proprietary dependencies.
> >
> > Conseq
