[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

URL: Summary: Submission of Kissinger 2 Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: fontdevelopment Submitted on: Sun 02 Jan 2022 12:27:45 PM UTC Should Start On: Sun 02 Jan 2022 12:00

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #1, task #16104 (project administration): Also note that Kissinger 2 is not to be confused with the original Kissinger. Kissinger is a glitchy outdated Unifont clone with bugfixes, whereas Kissinger 2 is an entirely new design. ___

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #3, task #16104 (project administration): There is no 'kissinger2ftest.pdf' in there, there's BDF. BDF is based on a text-like format, and the copyright notice in there is simply "public domain". The bdf file is generated with makekissinger2.cpp . What copyright notice would I us

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #5, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #4 comment #4:] > [comment #3 comment #3:] > > BDF is based on a text-like format, and the copyright notice in there is simply "public domain". > > I see no such text there. > It is at line 24 of the bdf. Note that it is in t

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #7, task #16104 (project administration): Here is the revised version: kissinger2-.tar.gz Replaced the lodepng dependency with public domain stb_image and stb_image_write which are bundled. Also added contributors in the bdf copyright notice (kissinger2test.bdf and kissinger2fte

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #9, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #8 comment #8:] > Thank you! > > It looks like codepagedatabase.cpp doesn't mention it's public domain; it does contain something that looks like a (custom?) permissive license, but then it needs a copyright notice. Please che

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #11, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #10 comment #10:] > I'm afraid we fundamentally differ in terminology. I think I essentially don't understand what you wrote in comment #9. The public domain rights resemble permissive rights but do not have the attribution r

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #13, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #12 comment #12:] > I don't think this makes sense for me; as I've just said, I don't understand your terms. You mean you don't understand the license terms? "The name of and the names of its contributors may be used to endo

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #15, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #14 comment #14:] > I mean I don't understand your wordings. This entire license is a wording for public domain (including trademark, patent, and no warranty). What else is supposed to be there that isn't already covered by ki

[task #16067] Submission of Dezyne

Follow-up Comment #29, task #16067 (project administration): [comment #28 comment #28:] > We expected an instant approval of Dezyne, or at least more discussion. > > But apparently we have overlooked the third option: Nothing happens. > > Today it is exactly three months ago that I submitted De

[task #16117] Submission of Honey Universal Programming Language

Follow-up Comment #1, task #16117 (project administration): The tar-ball link doesn't work. GitHub is an unethical service and is to be avoided at all costs, even at the cost of releasing proprietary software. ___ Reply to this item at:

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #18, task #16104 (project administration): The ISC license — https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:ISC — which is permissive, and the 0BSD license — https://landley.net/toybox/license.html — which is public domain, That's the difference. __

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #17, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #16 comment #16:] > You keep missing the difference between works in public domain and works under a (permissive) license, and this is crucial in order to maintain proper legal notices in your case. > > I have to cancel this

[task #16104] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #19, task #16104 (project administration): Check out my new submission, in there I have placed the public domain Unlicense in all non-trivial files. ___ Reply to this item at:

[task #16205] Submission of Kissinger 2

Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Effort: 0.00 ___ Follow-up Comments: --- Date: Tue 24 May 2022 12:33:07 PM UTC By: The fundamentals of fontdevelopm A new proje

[task #16205] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #2, task #16205 (project administration): [comment #1 comment #1:] > (task #16104) What is your point? All of the files in the Kissinger 2 resubmission are public domain and do not infringe on Unifont in any way. ___ Re

[task #16205] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #4, task #16205 (project administration): [comment #3 comment #3:] > > [comment #2 comment #2:] > > What is your point? > > Never mind; I just linked to your original submission, for the reference. Whenever you analyze a .hex file, increase the Percent Complete field of this t

[task #16205] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #6, task #16205 (project administration): [comment #5 comment #5:] > [comment #4 comment #4:] > > > > ...If at any point Paul Hardy sends any legal threats... > > Paul, could you look into this? Why does the OP anticipate problems? Don’t get Paul Hardy involved, seriously. H

[task #16205] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #7, task #16205 (project administration): And Paul Hardy is highly anti-competitive as well, he even went as far as refusing to self-promote his fonts to avoid competition. Just analyze my submission and move on. ___ Repl

[task #16205] Submission of Kissinger 2

Follow-up Comment #9, task #16205 (project administration): Seriously? You let one man (Paul Hardy) ruin the entire community? That’s implying GNU as a whole is anti-competitive. Now I have all the reason to believe GNU is unethical. ___