[Savannah-register-public] [task #15226] Submission of c2py

URL: Summary: Submission of c2py Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Sat 30 Mar 2019 08:21:37 AM UTC Should Start On: Sat 30 Mar 2019 12:00:00 AM UTC Sh

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15226] Submission of c2py

Follow-up Comment #2, task #15226 (project administration): I have added copyright and license notices to ChangeLog, NEWS, AUTHORS, and README. I have used the GNU All-Permissive License. Is this acceptable? I have attached the updated tarball. Is that the right way to do it? (file #46676) _

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15334] Submission of Magic Square

URL: Summary: Submission of Magic Square Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Sun 21 Jul 2019 03:31:33 PM EDT Should Start On: Sun 21 Jul 2019 12:00:00 AM E

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15388] Submission of libcrash

URL: Summary: Submission of libcrash Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Sat 14 Sep 2019 03:18:36 PM EDT Should Start On: Sat 14 Sep 2019 12:00:00 AM EDT

[Savannah-register-public] [task #15388] Submission of libcrash

Follow-up Comment #1, task #15388 (project administration): About the src/sig2str.c business: I realized that lib/sig2str.c in Coreutils it is not actually from Coreutils, but rather Gnulib (which Coreutils uses). I figured it would be better if I did the same, and used Gnulib rather than trying

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

URL: Summary: Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities) Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Tue 31 Mar 2020 01:16:12 PM EDT Should Start On: Tue 31 Mar 20

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #1, task #15583 (project administration): Also, I forgot to mention: has there been any progress on sr #109001 ? Because, if possible, I'd like the web pages repository to use git. _

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #3, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #2 comment #2:] > The bottom line is: if our licensing policies conflict with your philosophy, you shouldn't host your software on Savannah. I didn't realize that the GPL was incompatible with the GFDL. I guess I'll use another

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #5, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #4 comment #4:] > Thank you; please tell when your packages are ready be removed from Savannah. Well my other packages aren't currently conflicting with the GNU project, so I'd like to keep them on Savannah for now if you don't

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #7, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #6 comment #6:] > You could consider releasing the documentation under the GPL and the GFDL in parallel. Well, it's really the invariant sections that make the GFDL non-free. Preferably, I'd like to prohibit the inclusion of my

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #8, task #15583 (project administration): Also, I assume it's OK to keep the examples under the GPL only (not GFDL)? Should I add a notice to doc/mu.texi explaining that the examples are only released under the GPL, or is the README in doc/examples/ enough? _

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #9, task #15583 (project administration): Hello, It's been a week with no update. Is my new tarball with the dual license acceptable? If you'd rather not host my project on Savannah because of licensing issues, that's fine but please let me know. Thanks. __

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #11, task #15583 (project administration): OK, thanks for your help. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah ht

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #12, task #15583 (project administration): Also, just to clarify, when I said "I'd like to prohibit the inclusion of my documentation with non-free documentation [...]" I meant that ideally I would do that, but since it goes against Savannah's requirements I wouldn't. And since t

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #14, task #15583 (project administration): Yes, I will comply. And like I mentioned before, I'd like the .git/description to read: "Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities) -- a general purpose convenience library" (without the quotes, of course). And if possible, I'd like the web pages repo

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #16, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #15 comment #15:] > In your latest tarball, the examples don't comply. I've updated the license notice to allow distribution under the GFDL as well. Also, does the .gitignore file need a license notice? And how about doc/examp

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #18, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #17 comment #17:] > What do you think about them yourself? Well doc/examples/.dir-locals.el seems pretty trivial, but I guess it doesn't hurt to put a license notice in .gitignore. See the attached tarball. (file #48896) _

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #19, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #16 comment #16:] > I've updated the license notice to allow distribution under the GFDL as well. Actually, I was just looking at the source for the GNU Libc documentation, and it looks to me like the examples are available onl

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #21, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #20 comment #20:] > Please file a bug report against glibc. Done . As for my project, is the latest tarball acceptable? ___

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #23, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #22 comment #22:] > [comment #21 comment #21:] > > As for my project, is the latest tarball acceptable? > > I wonder what passages in our documentation suggest it may be. You mean the Savannah Hosting Requirements

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #25, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #24 comment #24:] > Now, Savannah Hosting Requirements says explicitly that all source files should include license notices; how can files like doc/examples/format.c comply to that? They contain neither copyright nor license not

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #26, task #15583 (project administration): I'm currently working on a feature for which I need Gnulib (sig2str). Since I'm already going to use Gnulib, I thought I might as well use the gpl-3.0 and fdl-1.3 modules (which provide those licenses in Texinfo format). But then I would

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #27, task #15583 (project administration): I added a feature to automatically capture output from the example programs to be included in the documentation, so I don't have to worry about updating it manually. The scripts to generate the output in Texinfo format are licensed under

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #28, task #15583 (project administration): Hey, Any chance of this getting accepted soon? I'm pretty sure it complies to Savannah's requirements. If it doesn't, please let me know so I can fix it. You also haven't told me whether I need to include the documentation licenses in v

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #30, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #29 comment #29:] > [comment #28 comment #28:] > > You also haven't told me whether I need to include the documentation licenses in version control, even though I'm using Gnulib for them. I'd be happy to do that, just let me kno

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #32, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #31 comment #31:] > To tell the truth, I didn't see anything in Gnulib documentation that would suggest that a snapshot of the used modules shouldn't be tracked by the VCS of the packages that use them, or that a copy of all mod

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #34, task #15583 (project administration): [comment #33 comment #33:] > That documentation is evidently incomplete. Those files are for including in Texinfo documentation. According to GPL Howto , the package should come with a copy

[task #15583] Submission of Mu (Miscellaneous Utilities)

Follow-up Comment #36, task #15583 (project administration): Indeed, you make a good point. I've suggested on the mailing list that they update the documentation. In any case, if you have further input, I think you should reply on the mailing list

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

URL: Summary: Submission of blikII Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Tue 15 Sep 2020 03:59:59 PM EDT Should Start On: Tue 15 Sep 2020 12:00:00 AM EDT

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #1, task #15775 (project administration): I have now added some phrases to blikII that the old blik used to say. However, I'm not sure what the copyright is on these phrases, and I'm trying to find out now. Until then, I'll make sure not to push them to the repository if this pro

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #2, task #15775 (project administration): Well I spoke to mattuc (the Head Admin of FICS), and he said he didn't know about the copyright status of the phrases. The author of the original blik (which is where these phrases are from) is Marcel van Kervinck, but I don't know if he

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #3, task #15775 (project administration): Hi. Is there any chance this could be accepted soon? If it can't be hosted on Savannah, please let me know. If I can't include the old blik phrases, then can I just add a commit removing the phrase file, or must I remove it from the enti

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #5, task #15775 (project administration): [comment #4 comment #4:] > I'm sorry, this tracker is backlogged a little bit. No problem. Thanks for your reply. > You are familiar with Savannah hosting requirements: no data with uncertain copyright status may be included (it will de

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #7, task #15775 (project administration): [comment #6 comment #6:] > [comment #5 comment #5:] > > > > OK, fine. I assume I'll have to remove the phrase file from the entire git history, then? > > We generally don't require such things; it's sufficient if the heads comply. OK,

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #9, task #15775 (project administration): Great, thanks. One more thing: I just pushed to the new repository, and the v0.1 tag points to a commit before I removed the phrase file with uncertain copyright. This means that in the cgit web interface

[task #15775] Submission of blikII

Follow-up Comment #11, task #15775 (project administration): [comment #10 comment #10:] > I believe you can download a tarball for any commit via cgit interface, can't you? Yes, it looks like you can. I just thought it might be a problem since the tagged tarball is more prominent. > Even when t

[task #15939] Submission of Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle

URL: Summary: Submission of Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Sat 10 Apr 2021 01:53:49 PM EDT Shoul

[task #15939] Submission of Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle

Follow-up Comment #1, task #15939 (project administration): Oh, also, another thing I forgot to mention: Software::License::GPL_3::or_later has a bug where it returns, for the SPDX identifier, "GPL-3.0-only" (inherited from Software::License::GPL_3) rather than the correct "GPL-3.0-or-later". I fi

[task #15939] Submission of Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle

Follow-up Comment #2, task #15939 (project administration): Hello. It seems that I forgot to add a license notice to .gitignore. I guess GNU All-Permissive is good for this file too, since it's so small? Please see the attached tarball (contains only the development directory). (file #51281)

[task #15939] Submission of Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle

Follow-up Comment #3, task #15939 (project administration): Hi. Not to rush, but any chance this could be accepted soon? I believe it follows all hosting requirements, and please let me know if it doesn't so I can fix it. Thanks! Also, another thing I just thought of: The documentation is under t

[task #15939] Submission of Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle

Follow-up Comment #5, task #15939 (project administration): [comment #4 comment #4:] > [comment #1 comment #1:] > > However, if anyone else makes a release, it will have the wrong identifier "GPL-3.0-only". > > This is confusing. Probably you would be better off if you didn't use this feature. W

[task #15953] Submission of Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::Author::ASDAGO

URL: Summary: Submission of Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::Author::ASDAGO Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Mon 26 Apr 2021 08:46:43 PM EDT Should Start On:

[task #15953] Submission of Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::Author::ASDAGO

Follow-up Comment #1, task #15953 (project administration): Oh, also another development dependency I forgot to mention is the just released Perl::PrereqScanner::Scanner::DistZilla::PluginBundle (license: GPLv3+).

[task #15954] Submission of Text::Wrap::OO

URL: Summary: Submission of Text::Wrap::OO Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Mon 26 Apr 2021 09:05:41 PM EDT Should Start On: Mon 26 Apr 2021 12:00:00 AM

[task #15961] Submission of Type::Tie::Aggregate

URL: Summary: Submission of Type::Tie::Aggregate Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: asdago Submitted on: Sat 01 May 2021 07:15:39 PM EDT Should Start On: Sat 01 May 2021 12:00

[task #15953] Submission of Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::Author::ASDAGO

Follow-up Comment #2, task #15953 (project administration): Hello. It's been a little while, any chance of getting this (and my other submissions ) approved soon? I believe they follow the hosting requirements. Than

[task #15953] Submission of Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::Author::ASDAGO

Follow-up Comment #4, task #15953 (project administration): [comment #3 comment #3:] > Sorry for the delay; the evaluation tracker is backlogged a little bit. No problem. > Approving. Thanks for your effort! If you need help with project evaluation, I could try evaluating some project submissi

[task #15964] Submission of Librebootreborn

Follow-up Comment #1, task #15964 (project administration): Hello Leah. Unfortunately, it seems that this project has issues which prevent it from being hosted on Savannah. Specifically, many of the third-party files included in the tarball do not have valid license notices or are incompatible wit