[Savannah-register-public] [task #5204] Submission of markonvert

2006-03-25 Thread Francesco Poli
Follow-up Comment #12, task #5204 (project administration): I know that the FSF promised that new versions of the GPL will be similar in spirit to the present one (it's written in GPLv2, section 9.). Unfortunately, looking at the first public draft of GPLv3, I cannot see any clear indication that

[Savannah-register-public] [task #5204] Submission of markonvert

2006-03-21 Thread Francesco Poli
Follow-up Comment #8, task #5204 (project administration): What if I don't consider the so-called ASP loophole as an issue? What if I don't want to (allow other people) restrict private use of my code, not even on a public network node? You are assuming that I regard GPLv2 as too weak a copyleft:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #5204] Submission of markonvert

2006-03-19 Thread Francesco Poli
Follow-up Comment #6, task #5204 (project administration): Are you really saying that Savannah won't accept my project *because* it's under the GNU GPL version 2 ?!? That is to say, just because it's not upgradeable to *any* future version of the GPL license? What if I don't like GPLv3, when th

[Savannah-register-public] [task #5204] Submission of markonvert

2006-03-15 Thread Francesco Poli
Follow-up Comment #4, task #5204 (project administration): Hello! I am well aware of the difficulties that a relicensing effort may pose. On the other hand, I'm not willing to license my work under yet unknown terms and conditions. I will relicense when GPLv3 is out, *if and only if* I like it a

[Savannah-register-public] [task #5204] Submission of markonvert

2006-01-23 Thread Francesco Poli
URL: Summary: Submission of markonvert Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: frx Submitted on: Tue 01/24/06 at 01:23 Should Start On: Tue 01/24/06 at 00:00