Follow-up Comment #8, task #15583 (project administration):
Also, I assume it's OK to keep the examples under the GPL only (not GFDL)?
Should I add a notice to doc/mu.texi explaining that the examples are only
released under the GPL, or is the README in doc/examples/ enough?
_
Follow-up Comment #7, task #15583 (project administration):
[comment #6 comment #6:]
> You could consider releasing the documentation under the GPL and the GFDL in
parallel.
Well, it's really the invariant sections that make the GFDL non-free.
Preferably, I'd like to prohibit the inclusion of my
Follow-up Comment #6, task #15583 (project administration):
[comment #5 comment #5:]
>
> I want the GNU project to be able to use my software, I just think that the
GFDL is too restrictive, and the GPL really seems the only other choice that
provides strong copyleft (which, I guess, makes it inc
