Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Hi Just added legal notice: http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/gsequencer.git/commit/?h=2.0.x&id=74e41c13f93f0f39af29e7e4f03956636f299073 Best regards, Joël On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Ineiev wrote: > Follow-up Comment #24, task #14667 (project administration): > > gsequencer.1 lacks a l

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #23, task #14793 (project administration): Would the following changes be okay? curhelp.xpm (fl_cursor_help.xpm) Copyright 2014 by Bill Spitzak and others. Licensed under the terms of the FLTK license curnesw.xpm (fl_cursor_nesw.xpm) Copyright 2014 by Bill Spitzak an

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Follow-up Comment #24, task #14667 (project administration): gsequencer.1 lacks a license notice. Please make sure every file in your tarball has valid copyright and license notices. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Update of task #14832 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Follow-up Comment #1, task #14832 (project administration): Hello, Matthew! There is some concern about nanomsg: its license text says its name is trademarked, without stating a trademark policy. Trademarks may render software proprietary. Then, your license messages are not quite unambiguous,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #22, task #14793 (project administration): Thank you! The text of readme files now lists the files with their copyright statements and cites FLTK license, but it doesn't state clearly that the license applies to those files. _